About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Thinking Outside the Pond: Benchmarking
Performance Expectations for Deep-water Reservoirs
Using Analog Data from the Gulf of Mexico
By
Shell International E&P, Inc.
Houston, TX
Industry has a considerable knowledge base from the central Gulf of Mexico (GOM) slope, yet to what extent can this database provide valid analogues for other slope systems? The GOM is viewed as an end-member above-grade ponded slope system in many conceptual models. This end-member status leads to both a de-emphasis of the value of applying knowledge derived from the GOM elsewhere and the value of applying knowledge from other slope systems to the GOM. But, the GOM slope contains examples of both a) ponded reservoirs (where receiving basin topography trapped entire flow volumes transported by variable flow sizes) and b) cases where flows of variable size and volume were far less affected by confining topography and hence have potential as partial analogues for comparable (dimensions, grain size) systems in less topographically confined settings.
The Brazos-Trinity depositional system
consists of four linked intraslope basins
(I – IV) located on the upper slope, offshore Texas and represents
a type locality for understanding general aspects of stepped
above-grade slopes and specific aspects ponded above-grade
slopes. Conceptual understanding of the fill history in these
basins include ‘fill and spill’ models where basins fill sequentially
in the seaward direction, to models which invoke coeval basin filling
with the coarse fraction retained preferentially in the up-dip
basins and synchronous early bypass of the fine fraction to downdip
basins. Integration of recent coring results with nearly
complete 3d seismic coverage has improved age dating and
reconstruction of infill history. Initially flows bypassed the upper
basins, forming the basal deposits in Basin IV. Deposition of high
net/gross sands in Basin II resulted from stripping of muds
suspended high within the flows entering the basin. These mud-prone
flows exited Basin II through a tributary-like flow
gathering zone near the basin exit point and ponded in the lower
part of Basin IV. The upper fill in Basin IV comprises a
submarine apron that is sourced by a continuous channel system
directly from a lowstand delta located in Basin I. Within this
apron, the observed seaward tapering is controlled by lower-efficiency
sandy sediment
gravity
flows of relatively low volume
with respect to basin size. Although high amplitude sea level
fluctuations during the last glacial-interglacial cycle have modified
the accumulation of sediment in Basin IV, the newly acquired
data from Basins IV and II show that basin
tectonics and flow dynamics also exerted a
strong influence in sediment fill distribution
through space and time.
The slope geometry and stratigraphic
architecture for the upper fill of a typical
GOM intraslope basin is similar to that
observed across stepped-slope profiles
documented from many continental
margins including the Niger delta, NW
Borneo, SE Brazil, Lower Congo and
Tanzania. Because a primary control on
reservoir distribution and architecture
across varied slope profiles is the interaction between local gradient
change and flow/grain size, analogous stratigraphic architectures
may be developed at different
absolute
slope positions. Therefore
there is potential to use the quantitative data from the GOM,
after careful selection of appropriate analogues, to help constrain,
a) net/gross distributions for use in STOIIP estimates from
calibrated seismic facies and b) expectations
of reservoir performance and
reserves estimates in other basins.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 11---------------