About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Recognizing Reservoir Compartments on Geologic
and Production Timescales in Deep-Water Reservoirs:
An
Example
from Genesis
Field
, Gulf of Mexico
Example
from Genesis
Field
, Gulf of Mexico
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co.
Houston, Texas
Akey objective of reservoir description is the early
identification of reservoir compartments. Early
recognition of compartments requires the integration
of structural and stratigraphic
data
with observations
of pressure and fluid contacts. At the exploration and
appraisal stage of
field
life, static compartments may
be recognized. In this talk we define static compartments
as reservoir compartments defined by boundaries
that, over geologic time, represent barriers to
fluid flow. Within a static compartment, the contact
between two fluids will settle at a single elevation.
Analysis of fluid contact and pressure
data
was done
within a rigorous framework, developed at
ExxonMobil, called Reservoir Connectivity Analysis
(RCA). As the
field
is depleted, other barriers and
baffles may become apparent through observation of
pressure depletion and aquifer movement. These
dynamic compartments are defined by boundaries
that are not effective barriers to fluid flow over
geologic time, but impede flow to the extent that they
have a significant impact on contact movement or
pressure depletion during production.
The Genesis Oil
Field
is located in Green Canyon
Blocks 205, 160 and 161, Gulf of Mexico.We explored
the stratigraphic and structural controls on compartmentalization
in two Pleistocene-age deepwater
reservoirs in Genesis
Field
(Neb 1 and Neb 3). We
interpreted the older of these reservoirs, Neb 3, as an
erosionally confined channel complex. Over a geologic
timescale, Neb 3 was a single compartment, with a
common oil-water contact throughout the
field
. As
the reservoir was produced, Neb 3 development wells
showed a common pressure decline trend and
moderate aquifer support indicating communication
in the oil column and between the oil column and
the aquifer. In contrast, Neb 1 showed at least two
different oil-water contacts before production started. Multiple barriers and baffles to flow became apparent with production. Aquifer support ranged from moderate to none.We interpreted Neb 1 as a channel levee complex. The connection between channels and levees appears to be poor and this is an important heterogeneity that was not previously recognized. In the case of the Neb 1 and Neb 3, reservoir architecture was the primary control on the degree of compartmentalization over both geologic and production timescales.End_Page 11---------------
End_of_Record - Last_Page 13---------------