About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Recognizing Reservoir Compartments on Geologic
and Production Timescales in Deep-Water Reservoirs:
An Example from Genesis Field, Gulf of Mexico
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co.
Houston, Texas
Akey objective of reservoir description is the early
identification of reservoir compartments. Early
recognition of compartments requires the integration
of structural and stratigraphic data with observations
of pressure and
fluid
contacts
. At the exploration and
appraisal stage of field life, static compartments may
be recognized. In this talk we define static compartments
as reservoir compartments defined by boundaries
that, over geologic time, represent barriers to
fluid
flow. Within a static compartment, the contact
between two fluids will settle at a single elevation.
Analysis of
fluid
contact and pressure data was done
within a rigorous framework, developed at
ExxonMobil, called Reservoir Connectivity Analysis
(RCA). As the field is depleted, other barriers and
baffles may become apparent through observation of
pressure depletion and aquifer movement. These
dynamic compartments are defined by boundaries
that are not effective barriers to
fluid
flow over
geologic time, but impede flow to the extent that they
have a significant impact on contact movement or
pressure depletion during production.
The Genesis Oil Field is located in Green Canyon Blocks 205, 160 and 161, Gulf of Mexico.We explored the stratigraphic and structural controls on compartmentalization in two Pleistocene-age deepwater reservoirs in Genesis Field (Neb 1 and Neb 3). We interpreted the older of these reservoirs, Neb 3, as an erosionally confined channel complex. Over a geologic timescale, Neb 3 was a single compartment, with a common oil-water contact throughout the field. As the reservoir was produced, Neb 3 development wells showed a common pressure decline trend and moderate aquifer support indicating communication in the oil column and between the oil column and the aquifer. In contrast, Neb 1 showed at least two
different oil-waterEnd_Page 11---------------
contacts
before production started. Multiple
barriers and baffles to flow became apparent
with production. Aquifer support ranged
from moderate to none.We interpreted Neb 1
as a channel levee complex. The connection
between channels and levees appears to be
poor and this is an important heterogeneity
that was not previously recognized. In
the case of the Neb 1 and Neb 3, reservoir
architecture was the primary control on the
degree of compartmentalization over both
geologic and production timescales.
Top Neb 1 depth
structure map showing key wells and Neb 1 oil-water
contacts
, fault traces and
an outline of Neb 1 channel.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 13---------------