About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Using Modern Cave Systems as Analogs for
Paleokarst Reservoirs
Subsurface Technology,
ConocoPhillips
Dissolution processes, hydrology, void dimensions, and architecture are useful in understanding karsted rocks that serve as reservoirs for oil and natural gas. Three-dimensional cave surveys can be used to assign properties to “karst” cells in geocellular models. Surveys of long karst passages (e.g., Yucatan flooded caves) can be used to infer connectivity (i.e. how many “karst” cells can be neighbors?).
Karst processes ranging from surface weathering to deep burial
dissolution have affected numerous karsted intervals that host
petroleum accumulations. Recognition and prediction of
subsurface paleokarst from seismic or borehole information and
prediction of potential petroleum
production
involves addressing
the following questions:
• Does the layer in question consist primarily of carbonate rocks?
End_Page29---------------
• Is there evidence to suggest subaerial exposure of the carbonates?
• Can a humid paleoclimate be documented?
• What was the paleo-relief?
• Does the tectonic history include episodes of jointing, faulting, or fracturing that would focus flowing water in the paleohydrologic setting?
• Is there reason to suspect burial dissolution?
• Did karst dissolution pre-date petroleum migration?
• What differences would karsting make to
wellbore deliverability, well spacing,
drilling operations, injection strategies,
and
production
profiles?
Analogs and regional studies incorporating
the elements of these questions can be used
in the exploration and
production
workflow
to identify potential
problems
and opportunities,
to constrain geo-model input, and to
improve communication of subsurface risks
and uncertainties.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 31---------------