About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 52, No. 01, September 2009. Page 17 - 17.

Abstract: The Devil in the Details: What Controls Vertical and Lateral Variation of Hydrocarbon Source and Shale-Gas Reservoir Potential at Millimeter to Kilometer Scales?

Kevin M. Bohacs
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Houston, Texas

Hydrocarbon source and shale-gas reservoir character varies at the cm-scale vertically and at the km-scale laterally in systematic ways that can be deciphered using process-based models within a Previous HitsequenceNext Hit-stratigraphic framework. Even in mudstonedominated strata deposited hundreds of kilometers from coeval shorelines, parasequences exhibit systematic variations in physical, biogenic, and chemical attributes. These variations arise from changing relations among the key sets of processes that influence the production, destruction, and dilution of organic matter.

Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic examples (including the New Albany, Barnett, and Mowry Shales, Monterey and Sisquoc Formations) exhibit major shifts in mudstone properties at Previous HitsequenceNext Hit boundaries, flooding, and downlap surfaces. These shifts can be recognized independently on seismic, Previous HitlogNext Hit, core, and thin-section data. They also show systematic vertical and lateral variations in those properties at the parasequence- and parasequence-set scale. Prospective facies tend to occur in discrete packages that are diachronous across a basin, making it essential to employ the various physical Previous HitsequenceNext Hit-stratigraphic surfaces to correlate appropriately and to decipher the distribution of hydrocarbon potential.

Location with respect to sediment sources and shorelines is a key factor that can be discerned using close examination of sedimentary structures in thin section and hand specimen, integrated with detailed Previous HitwellNext Hit-Previous HitlogTop correlation and geochemical analyses. Parasequences in proximal reaches tend to have totalorganic- carbon (TOC) content inversely related to sandstone content, maximum grain size, sandstone-bed thickness, level of bioturbation, and skeletal phosphate content. The maximum TOC is positively correlated with hydrogen index (HI) at small TOC values and inversely correlated with HI at large TOC values. TOC is largest at parasequence bases. All observations in proximal sections indicate that dilution by non-hydrogen-rich material is the dominant control on source potential.

In distal areas, maximum TOC content is positively correlated, but only weakly, with maximum grain size and bed thickness. Maximum TOC content is also positively related to phosphate content, HI, and, counter-intuitively, level of bioturbation. TOC is largest near parasequence tops—the opposite of what is seen in proximal areas. The positive correlation of TOC, HI, and phosphorous content suggests that variations in primary organic production or preservation were the key influence on source character (and not dilution). The positive correlation of TOC and HI with bioturbation index further indicates that production was the controlling factor in this setting. Increased bioturbation and slow sedimentation rates should lead to decreased preservation of organic matter through increased consumption and decreased burial efficiency. The observed accumulation of organic matter under these conditions points to production rates of organic matter in excess of the capacity to consume or degrade it.

An appreciation of variations at such small scales should enable the selection of appropriate and representative samples, an understanding of how they correlate away from sample control, and the calculation of net source or reservoir. These relations influence such economically important factors as evaluation and assessment of net volumes of source or gas-in-place, expected hydrocarbon type and quality, and timing of generation.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 17---------------

Copyright © 2009 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.