About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Re-evaluating Depositional Models for Shelf Shales
1Robert E. Sheriff Professor of Sequence Stratigraphy,
Geosciences Department, University of Houston
Houston, Texas , U.S.A.
2Department of Earth Sciences
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Despite the assumption that the bulk of marine “shelf” mud
is deposited by gradual fallout from suspension in quiet
water, modern muddy shelves and their associated rivers show
that they are dominated by hyperpycnal fluid mud. This has not
been widely applied to the interpretation of ancient sedimentary
shale successions. We analyze several ancient Cretaceous prodelta
shelf systems and their associated river deposits. Paleodischarge
estimates of trunk rivers show that they fall within the predicted
limits of rivers that are capable of generating hyperpycnal
plumes. The associated prodeltaic mudstones match modern
hyperpycnite facies models, and suggest a correspondingly
hyperpycnal character. Physical sedimentary structures include
diffusely stratified beds that show both
normal and
inverse
grading (Fig. 1), indicating sustained flows that waxed and
waned. They also display low intensities
of bioturbation (Fig. 2), which reflect the
high physical and chemical stresses of
hyperpycnal environments. Hyperpycnal
conditions are ameliorated by the fact that these rivers were
relatively small, dirty systems that drained an active orogenic belt
during humid temperate to subtropical “greenhouse” conditions.
During sustained periods of flooding, such as during monsoons,
the initial river flood may lower salinities within the inshore area,
effectively “prepping” the area and allowing subsequent floods to
become hyperpycnal much more easily. Although shelf slopes
were too low to allow long-run-out hyperpycnal flows, the
storm-dominated nature of the seaway likely allowed fluid mud
to be transported for significant distances across and along the
paleo-shelf. Prodelta hyperpycnites form leaner, gas-prone source
rocks, prone to the generation of overpressure, versus more
slowly deposited, organic-rich, anoxic laminites and condensedsection
shales.
End_Page 13---------------
Figure 1. Core photograph of diffusely bedded prodelta mudstones and siltstones, with no
bioturbation. Note the
inverse
grading at 7, 8, and 12 cm. Scale is 3 cm. Core sample is from the
Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation, Canada (from Bhattacharya and MacEachern, in press).
End_Page 15---------------
Figure 2. Core photo of prodelta facies of the Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation, showing both
inverse
and normally graded siltstones.
Wispy mud-streaks at 4.5cm are identified as Phycosiphon. Note that these lie in the clayey tops of thick graded siltstone beds, and may
reflect colonization of the bed top after deposition. Lateral disruption of sandy and silty laminae may represent “mantle and swirl”
(ms) structures, recording the activity of sediment-swimming organisms in the rather soupy substrate. Small flame structures in upper
units also indicate soft-sediment deformation. Unlabeled Planolites (P) occurs on the right side of the photo, and marked on the
litholog.
End_of_Record - Last_Page 16---------------