About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


Houston Geological Society Bulletin, Volume 52, No. 8, April 5, 2010. Pages 23, 25, and 27.

Abstract: The Discovery of Rich Previous HitGasNext Hit Hydrate Accumulations in Sand Reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico – Results from DOE-Chevron Joint Industry Project Drilling

Dan McConnell1, Ray Boswell2, Timothy S. Collett3, Matthew Frye4, William Shedd4, Stefan Mrozewski5, Gilles Guerin5, Ann Cook5, Dianna Shelander6, Jianchun Dai6, Paul Godfriaux4, Rebecca Dufrene4, Emrys Jones7, and Rana Roy7
1AOA Geophysics
2U.S. Department of Energy
3U.S. Geological Survey
4Minerals Management Service
5Columbia University
6Schlumberger
7Chevron

In April and May of 2009 the Gulf of Mexico Previous HitGasNext Hit Hydrate Joint Industry Project realized its second field program (Leg II) with the semi-submersible Helix Q4000 drillship. The three-week, $11.5MM expedition drilled seven logging-while-drilling (LWD) holes at three sites to test a variety of geologic/geophysical models for the occurrence of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in sand reservoirs in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Over 17,000 ft of sedimentary section were logged using a state-of-the-art bottom-hole assembly. The three sites drilled were Walker Ridge (WR) Block 313, Green Canyon (GC) Block 955, andAlaminos Canyon (AC) Block 21. The program was completed on-time and under budget. The locations for JIP Leg II drilling were the result of an integrated geological and geophysical prospecting approach that considered direct geophysical evidence for Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate-bearing strata in the context of evaluation of indicators for Previous HitgasNext Hit sourcing, gasmigration pathways to the shallow section, and occurrence of sand reservoirs within the Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate stability zone. High saturation Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate deposits in sands were found, where predicted, in four of five holes at two sites, WR 313 and GC 955. The third site, AC 21, indicated low to moderate Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate saturation in extensive shallow sands. The full research-level LWD assembly deployed for Leg II collected gamma-ray, neutron and density porosity, neutron spectroscopy Previous HitdataNext Hit, as well as full azimuthal resistivity and acoustic velocity, including both compressional and shear-wave measurements.

Leg II was clearly a high-risk proposition, despite the drilling of a large number of industry wells in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, there had been only one prior instance (at Alaminos Canyon Block 818) in which Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate had been reported to occur in sand. Nonetheless, the potential for Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate at high saturation in sands was large; an assessment conducted under the leadership of the Minerals Management Service produced a mean estimate of 6,700 tcf Previous HitgasNext Hit-inplace in Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate-bearing sands in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Perhaps the primary scientific objective of the Leg II program was to provide ground truth Previous HitdataNext Hit to test the soundness of the prospecting techniques developed with the JIPs site selection team. One part of this approach was predrill inversions of seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit to estimate areal variations in Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate saturation.

The two wells in WR 313, in the Terrebonne Basin, confirmed the pre-drill models. The main Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate target s were approximately 2,700 ft below the seafloor. The first well, WR 313 G, had a predrill prediction of 57% Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in the target sand. LWD indicated a net of ~30 ft of sand containing Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate with a saturation of 70% at the target horizon. The second well approximately 0.6 miles east and updip, WR 313 H, tested a similar but stratigraphically deeper target. The pre-drill saturation was 53% at the primary target. Results show two lobes of very clean sand with over 90% Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate saturation in the upper lobe. Saturations in the lower lobe ranged from 50% to 60%. In addition, both holes revealed a shallow unit with 350-500 ft of grain-displacing fracture filling Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in clays beginning approximately 600 ft below the sea floor.

Three holes were drilled in GC Block 955 just outboard of the Sigsbee Escarpment, where a wide and thick late Pleistocene channel complex has been fractured and uplifted by a shallow salt stock. A highly faulted four-way closure with numerous amplitude anomalies at the base of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate stability is near to but west of the channel axis. The first well GC 955 I was closest to an industry well that penetrated thick sands. As expected, the “I” well encountered a thick sand section but the sands contained primarily water with only a few feet of potential Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate.

The next two wells, GC 955 H and GC 955 Q, targeted the sand at the four-way closure approximately 0.7 miles proximal to the youngest well-preserved channel axis in the depositional sequence. The LWD Previous HitdataNext Hit Previous HitobtainedNext Hit at this location indicate over 100 ft of Previous HitgasNext Hit-hydrate-bearing zones within a single sand-rich unit with saturations estimated to be over 70%. This accumulation is overlain and underlain by, and most surprisingly, interbedded with Previous HitgasNext Hit-hydratefree, water-bearing sands. In addition to the Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in the target sand, fracture fill Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate was detected in the clay-prone section above the target. GC 955 Q is believed to have encountered at least 50 ft of highly saturated Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate sand at the target, but drilling was aborted because of a potential Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate dissociation event and subsequent Previous HitgasNext Hit flow. The LWD Previous HitdataNext Hit, however, show complex acoustic responses and are still being analyzed before a confident interpretation of the pore fill in the drilled interval can be offered. However, it appears that Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate occurrence, at the GC 955 site is highly complex, both in the sands and in the overlying clays, and is potentially complicated by fault-controlled compartmentalization and related lateral variations in Previous HitgasNext Hit delivery, thermal gradients, pore-water salinities, and other phenomena.

The two wells drilled in Alaminos Canyon Block 21 (AC21), in the vicinity of the Diana Field development, confirmed the predrill prediction of potential extensive occurrence of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrates in shallow sand reservoirs at relatively low (

The expedition demonstrated the ability to reasonably predict Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate occurrence through seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit in the absence of pre-drill well Previous HitdataNext Hit. At WR313, the model linking aligned phase reversals at multiple levels with Previous HitgasNext Hit-hydrate bearing sands at the base of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate stability (BGHS) was confirmed. Furthermore, initial results suggest that Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate has the potential to fully saturate reservoirs well above the BGHS, with the primary control being occurrence of reservoir quality facies. In addition, unexpected findings, such as the complex nature of the Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate occurrence at GC Block 955 and the discovery of the extensive, strata-bound shallow hydrate occurrence at WR Block 313, raise exciting new questions.

The DOE and the JIP are committed to making these Previous HitdataTop publically available as soon as possible to support a wide range of scientific studies. The initial reports will be published shortly at http://www.netl.doe.gov/ MethaneHydrates/JIPLegII-IR/

Unnumbered figure.

Unnumbered figure.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 27---------------

Copyright © 2010 by Houston Geological Society. All rights reserved.