About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Abstract
Abstract: Hydrocarbon Accumulations and Exploration
Considerations
Associated with Impact Structures
Considerations
Associated with Impact Structures
Rock Characterization and
Modeling Research Team
Shell International E&P
Houston, Texas
High-velocity impacts of solid bodies on planetary surfaces trigger an explosion-like process resulting in characteristic circular structures called “impact craters or structures”. Approximately 180 impact structures have been recognized on Earth, representing about a quarter of the estimated preserved structures in the geological record. The impact events are an integral part of the Earth’s geological history and some of them have presented significant economic opportunities.
The impact process can facilitate or hinder any critical element
of a working hydrocarbon system, depending on the geological
circumstances. Drilling success rates in an impact setting are
comparable to those in any
other
play. The recoverable hydrocarbon
reserves in the following structures owe
their origin in part to the impact
process: Ames (Oklahoma; 53 mil.
boe), Avak (Alaska; 9 mil. boe), Cloud
Creek (Wyoming; 3-30 mil. boe), Eagle
Butte (Alberta, Canada; 8 mil. boe),
Newporte (North Dakota; 15 mil. boe),
Red Wing (North Dakota; 43-73 mil.
boe), Steen River (Alberta, Canada;
0.3-1 mil. boe), collapse breccias of the
Chicxulub structure (Mexico; 57 bil. boe), and possibly one
accumulation at Tookoonooka (Australia; 0.3 mil. boe). The same appears to be true for the accumulations at the probable impact
structures Bee Bluff (Texas; 0.3 mil boe), Calvin (Michigan; 3 mil
boe), and Viewfield (Saskatchewan, Canada; 12-14 mil. boe).
Additionally, immature post-impact source rocks have been
mined at Boltysh and Rotmistrovka (Ukraine), and also
documented at the Obolon (Ukraine), Flynn Creek (Tennessee),
and Ries (Germany)structures.
Contrary to previous work, this study documents that: 1) the accumulations at the Marquez (Texas) and Sierra Madera (Texas) structures are not related to the impact process, 2) the heat generated during an impact event does not contribute to the maturation of the pre- or post-impact source rocks, and 3) there are no spatial or temporal trends in the distribution of impact structures that could be used to guide exploration for undiscovered structures. However, the probability of finding an impact structure of a particular size in a particular sedimentary basin can be estimated from the known cratering rates, the time span, and the area of the basin. Deep ocean floor areas must be excluded because the thick water column prevents formation of most impact structures. Aerially extensive data sets (i.e. seismic, potential fields, and imagery) can also be used to scan for circular structures.