About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Houston Geological Society Bulletin

Abstract


The Houston Geological Society Bulletin
Vol. 59 (2016), No. 3. (November), Page 26

Abstract: Using Previous HitGravityNext Hit to Determine Basement Geology between the Mid-Continent Rift (MCR) and the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA)

Kevin Crain1

In this study, the upper crystalline basement lies between the basement topography and 16 km below mean sea level. The residual Previous HitgravityNext Hit Previous HitanomalyNext Hit of the upper basement is estimated by stripping the Previous HitgravityNext Hit effects of known and geologically consistent 3D model density distributions of known and expected geologies above and below the upper crystalline basement. Modeling the geology as piecewise continuous density distributions allows me to model 100 square degrees of mapped and expected surface and subsurface geologies from the topographic surface to 100 km below sea level. Then inverting these expected density distributions I minimize the misfit between the observed and estimated free-air Previous HitgravityNext Hit. This residual free-air Previous HitanomalyNext Hit reflects the density distribution in the upper basement.

The observed Previous HitgravityNext Hit data are 3D free-air Previous HitgravityNext Hit point data collected at unique spatial locations and times, and the free-air Previous HitgravityNext Hit measures the Previous HitgravityNext Hit effect of the Earth’s unique 3D density distribution. Modeling the Earth’s 3D density distribution consist of representative 3D geology Previous HitmodelsNext Hit containing observed, expected, and geologically consistent 3D formation and lithology boundaries. Then using lithology to density relationships, I build an expected 3D density distribution. The Previous HitgravityNext Hit effect of the model 3D density distribution is calculated at each 3D Previous HitgravityNext Hit data point using SIGMA, a recently developed Previous HitgravityNext Hit and Previous HitgravityNext Hit gradiometry algorithm.

Then, using a geologically and statistically constrained density inversion, the expected density model is adjusted to minimize the misfit between the observed and estimated free-air Previous HitgravityNext Hit. The residual free-air Previous HitanomalyNext Hit, RFAA, represents the basement geology mass distribution and indicates a complex basement geology and geologic structure that appear to be consistent with earthquake seismicity and thermal maturity sources as reflected in the Woodford Shale vitrinite reflectance data.

Speaker Biography

Kevin Crain earned his BS in geophysics from New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and his MS and PhD in Geosciences from The University of Texas at El Paso. His research interest have focused on atmospheric electric-field studies, then later studying surface wave and ultrasonic non-destructive test techniques of geomedia, as well as 3D Previous HitgravityNext Hit modeling for minerals, and petroleum exploration. Currently he is working as a Research Scientist for the Oklahoma Geological Survey focusing on 3D Previous HitgravityTop modeling associated with Oklahoma earthquakes.

Acknowledgments and Associated Footnotes

1 Kevin Crain: Oklahoma Geological Survey

Copyright © 2016 by HGS (Houston Geological Society)