About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Alaska Geological Society

Abstract


Alaska Geological Society 2001 Geology Symposium, 2001
Page 16

Using GPS to Unravel the Tectonics of Interior Alaska - Abstract

Hilary J. Fletcher,1 Jeffrey T. Freymueller2

Geologic maps of interior Alaska show a high occurrence of faulting. Information about these faults has up to now been based mainly on geological observations in the field. Seismicity maps give us some information on the location and activity of certain faults, but the density of seismic sites is far from ideal. The most obvious tectonic feature in the interior of Alaska is the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit, which is visible on satellite maps as a geomorphic feature extending in a broad arc for more than 2000 km. Slip rates of 8–12 mm/yr are estimated for the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit based on offset Pleistocene glacial features to the east of Mt. McKinley. However, previous geodetic measurements of slip rate along the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit produced results that appeared to show a much smaller rate of right lateral shear. Another major tectonic feature in Alaska is the Tintina Previous HitfaultNext Hit, a large right lateral Previous HitfaultNext Hit system 250km to the north of the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit. The pattern of seismicity in the region between these two Previous HitfaultNext Hit systems shows NE-SW lineations, which have been interpreted as edges of elongate crustal blocks.

Since 1995 we have been making GPS observations in this region, with the goal of using deformation information as another tool to understand the present-day tectonics. Our observation network consists of 55 GPS sites in interior Alaska, the majority of which have been measured at least four times. We find that sites within about 50 km of Fairbanks show no significant motion with respect to Fairbanks, indicating a low rate of strain accumulation for this region which spans three NE-SW seismic lineations between the Denali and Tintina faults. Sites further south have velocities consistent with right-lateral slip on the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit. We construct a model combining counter-clockwise rotation of the block south of the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit with elastic strain accumulation on the Previous HitfaultNext Hit. Using this model, the data require a slip rate of 7–11 mm/yr on the Denali Previous HitfaultNext Hit or distributed on faults within 30km of the Denali Previous HitfaultTop.

Acknowledgments and Associated Footnotes

1 Hilary J. Fletcher: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Geology and Geophysics, and Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, (907)474-7309;

2 Jeffrey T. Freymueller: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Geology and Geophysics, and Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, (907)474-7309

Copyright © 2014 by the Alaska Geological Society