About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 40 (1956)

Issue: 2. (February)

First Page: 425

Last Page: 426

Title: Structural Geology of Arbuckle Mountain Region: ABSTRACT

Author(s): William E. Ham

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

The Arbuckle Mountain region of south-central Oklahoma is made up of thick Paleozoic rocks that were folded and faulted during several orogenic episodes within Middle and Late Pennsylvanian time. Pre-Pennsylvanian rocks ranging in age from Cambrian through Mississippian are differentiated into a southwestern basin province containing nearly 12,000 feet of sediments and a northeastern shelf province containing 7,000 feet of sediments. Ordovician rocks, principally carbonates, make up more than two-thirds of the stratigraphic section, having a thickness of 8,500 feet in the basin and 5,000 feet on the shelf. The region persisted in pre-Pennsylvanian time as a continually sinking site of marine deposition, in which slight local uplift but no mountain-building orogeny is indi ated.

During Pennsylvanian time 17,000 feet of strata that are chiefly fine-grained clastic sediments were deposited in the Ardmore basin, adjoining the Arbuckle Mountains on the south, nearly in the same position as, and doubtless the continuation of, the older Ordovician basin. In the central part of the Arbuckle Mountains and along the northern edge, Pennsylvanian marine clastics and limestone are interstratified with conglomerates in a sequence not more than 5,000 feet thick. These rocks were deposited over the site of the earlier shelf area.

Structural differentiation of the Arbuckle Mountains began in early mid-Pennsylvanian time with the slow epeirogenic rise of the shelf area--the Hunton anticline--which resulted in the spreading of conglomeratic strata in surrounding areas of marine deposition. The Hunton anticline evidently remained emergent and was being continually uplifted through most of the Middle and Late Pennsylvanian. Total uplift was approximately 4,100 feet, nearly all of which was attained by gentle domal warping, and the Hunton anticline now stands as the most simple of all the major Arbuckle Mountain structural features. It is the only anticlinal structure to be uplifted so little that Lower Ordovician, Cambrian, and pre-Cambrian rocks are not exposed.

While the shelf area was rising, the basin area continued to sink and to receive sediments, partly derived from the eroding Hunton anticline. Local uplift on the northeast flank of the present Arbuckle anticline and north flank of the Tishomingo anticline resulted in pre-Desse erosion of all or parts of the Atoka, Wapanucka, and Springer formations, but the south flanks of these anticlines are structurally and stratigraphically conformable with the thick Pennsylvanian rocks of the Ardmore basin. Neither the Arbuckle anticline nor the Tishomingo anticline was a significant positive area until after the close of Hoxbar time.

Principal deformation of the Arbuckle Mountains was during the Late Pennsylvanian Virgil epoch. The Hunton anticline underwent its last and one of its strongest orogenic pulses just before Ada (mid-Virgilian) time, and it is inferred that the chief folding of the Arbuckle anticline, as well as the Tishomingo anticline, Mill Creek syncline, and Belton anticline, occurred during this episode. This was a short but severe time of structural deformation. The Arbuckle anticline was sharply folded, overturned on its north flank and locally on its south flank, and faulted in its axial part by thrusting. Parts of the fault systems probably were established at this time. Structural uplift was so

End_Page 425------------------------------

great that the Reagan sandstone of Cambrian age was locally exposed, from which it can be deduced that 11,000 feet of pre-Pennsylvanian rocks and probably at least 5,000 feet of Pennsylvanian strata had been stripped away.

The orogenic product derived from this deformation was the Collings Ranch conglomerate, a massive limestone boulder deposit which has an exposed thickness of 2,000 feet and a probable initial thickness of 3,000 feet. From the character of the rocks comprising the conglomerate, it is certain that the source areas were the Arbuckle and Tishomingo anticlines.

A slightly later surge of orogeny continued and even intensified the deformation. Block faulting, accompanied by some folding, broke the folded complex along previously established structural lines into grabens and horsts elevating the anticlines to greater heights and permitting the exposure, after erosion, of large granite areas in the Tishomingo and Belton anticlines. The Collings Ranch conglomerate was mostly eroded except where preserved in grabens, and the new orogenic deposit, the Vanoss conglomerate of latest Pennsylvanian age, was spread as a feldspar-rich blanket on the strongly folded and eroded edges of the older rocks. This younger conglomerate has a maximum thickness of 650 feet on the western edge of the Mill Creek syncline, nearest the Arbuckle and Tishomingo anticline . At a few places the lower part of the Vanoss conglomerate is faulted and slightly folded by a final weak pulse, but the overlying younger rocks, including the Hart limestone which is considered to be the base of the Permian system, are virtually flat and mark the close of the Arbuckle orogeny in this region.

One of the major problems in Arbuckle Mountain structural interpretation concerns the nature of the northwest-trending through-going faults, principally the Washita Valley fault, Reagan fault, and the Sulphur fault zone. These have been variously interpreted as normal, thrust, scissor, and rift faults. Dips observed or inferred on the outcrop, together with information from drill holes, indicate that these faults locally have normal and locally thrust relations, and the conclusion is reached that both the Washita Valley and Reagan faults have a component of strike-slip movement. The Tishomingo anticline is believed to have moved northwestward between these two faults, probably as a result of stress transmitted from the Ouachita Mountains.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 426------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists