About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin


Volume: 48 (1964)

Issue: 4. (April)

First Page: 547

Last Page: 547

Title: Sediment Structures Generated by Flow in Alluvial Channels: ABSTRACT

Author(s): D. B. Simons, E. V. Richardson, Carl Nordin

Article Type: Meeting abstract


The forms of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness which are molded from the Previous HitbedNext Hit material by the flow in alluvial channels are broadly classified by their shape and their effect on flow resistance and by the mode of bedload transport associated with the Previous HitbedNext Hit form. The most common forms of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness include ripples, dunes, a transition roughness as the dunes change to a plane or flat Previous HitbedNext Hit, plane Previous HitbedNext Hit, standing waves, and antidunes. The forms of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness change from ripples to dunes and ultimately to antidunes as the tractive force is increased.

The physical relationships between form of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness and the variables upon which form roughness depends are extremely complex. The independent variables are interrelated so that it is impossible to completely isolate the effect of a single independent variable on form roughness in a flume or stream. Important interrelated variables include: characteristics of Previous HitbedNext Hit material such as physical size, fall diameter and gradation; the temperature or fluid viscosity; the concentration of very fine sediment; and the depth as well as other flow variables. Methods of predicting forms of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness from known characteristics of the flow and sediment are inexact, but as a first approximation, the Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness is related to stream power and median fall diameter of Previous HitbedNext Hit material.

Different types of cross-bedding are associated with the various roughness elements, based on equilibrium flow conditions in recirculating flumes. The tendency for all flows to meander, even in straight channels, complicates both the forms of Previous HitbedNext Hit roughness and the types of cross-bedding. This tendency to meander is reinforced by the large bars which exist adjacent to one bank and then the other on the beds of alluvial channels. These bars may be of such small amplitude to go almost unnoticed in a given system, particularly when small width-depth ratios exist. However, if by reducing depth or by widening the channel the width-depth ratio is increased, these large bars may develop to almost the full depth of the channel. The regular forms of Previous HitbedTop roughness are in general superposed on th se large bars, but the roughness forms change dramatically as the depth, velocity, and direction of flow change over the bar as deposition and development of the bars progress.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 547------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists