About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 68 (1984)

Issue: 8. (August)

First Page: 1004

Last Page: 1023

Title: Controls on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Glauconitic Sandstone, Suffield Heavy Oil Sands, Southern Alberta

Author(s): Barbara J. Tilley (2), Fred J. Longstaffe (3)

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Hydrocarbon distribution in the Lower Cretaceous Glauconitic sandstone in the Suffield area of southeastern Alberta is controlled by three factors: sedimentology, structure, and mineralogy. The Glauconitic sandstone consists of six lithological facies interpreted to represent the lower-middle shoreface, middle shoreface, upper shoreface-foreshore, backshore, marsh, and lagoonal zones of a progradational, barrier-island system. Sediment deposited in the foreshore zone (laminated sandstone facies) has the best reservoir qualities: good porosity, low clay content, and good lateral continuity. The bioturbated, argillaceous sandstone, deposited in the backshore zone, has poor reservoir qualities: low porosity and high clay content with only isolated porous zones. Tidal inlet a d/or later stage fluvial channel deposits cutting through the sandstone trend form discontinuities in the reservoir.

The hydrocarbon trapping mechanism is stratigraphic but with some structural influence. Deep faults, active during the deposition of upper Mannville sediments, caused differential subsidence and local thickening of sediment. This activity resulted in the apparent lateral juxtaposition of different facies.

Parts of the Glauconitic sandstone form an exceptionally thick beach-shoreface sequence (up to 45 m or 148 ft thick). Faulting of sub-Cretaceous units may have controlled the rate of subsidence and the amount of sediment accumulation during deposition of the Glauconitic sandstone.

The abundance of clay, mostly kaolinite, largely controls reservoir quality. Argillaceous backshore sandstones, which contain abundant detrital kaolinite, are poor reservoirs; clean foreshore deposits are good reservoirs. Porosity and permeability are only slightly reduced in the clean sandstone by formation of diagenetic phases such as kaolinite and quartz. During the wet forward-combustion recovery process, migration of kaolinite and dissolution-reprecipitation of silica could cause formation damage.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].