About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 69 (1985)

Issue: 4. (April)

First Page: 676

Last Page: 677

Title: Northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska: New Evidence for Complex Thin-Skinned Thrusting: ABSTRACT

Author(s): R. P. Rattey

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Extensive fieldwork has shed new light on the style of deformation in the Franklin, Romanzof, and British Mountains of the northeastern Brooks Range. Bedding-parallel thrusting controls the structure, and two

End_Page 676------------------------------

major decollements are recognized. In the mountain belt, the lower one lies in the Lower Carboniferous Kayak Formation but often steps down to the base of the Upper Devonian Kanayut or Lower Carboniferous Kekiktuk Conglomerates. Near the Sadlerochit and Shublik Mountains, it steps down to its deepest level to the base of the Cambrian to Middle Devonian Katakturuk Dolomite. The upper decollement is poorly exposed in the mountains and lies in the Jurassic Kingak Shale. Locally, these are removed by Early Cretaceous erosion and the decollement steps upsequence.

The two decollements separate three tectonic sequences that deform differently. First, basement below the lower decollement deforms into a set of thrust duplexes. The core of these is well exposed in the Franklin Mountains. The Sagavanirktok sidewall ramp is a major basement structure that causes the northern swing in the mountain front between the central and northeastern Brooks Range. Second, the lower cover between the two decollements deforms more complexly than basement by both passive drape over the underlying duplexes and by active thrust stacking. Large-scale buckle folding occurs in a shear zone above the Sagavanirktok sidewall ramp. Third, the upper cover above the upper decollement is poorly preserved in the mountains as allochthonous klippe in depressions in the basement a d lower cover duplexes.

Crustal shortening across the eastern Brooks Range is estimated by two-dimensional section balancing at over 400 km. This is substantially more than previous estimates and is comparable to those for the western Brooks Range. The inferred lack of relative rotation between the western and eastern Brooks Range does not substantiate a rotational opening for the Arctic Ocean.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 677------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists