About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 76 (1992)

Issue: 3. (March)

First Page: 339

Last Page: 355

Title: Previous HitPorosityNext Hit and Packing of Holocene River, Dune, and Beach Sands (1)

Author(s): JOHN E. ATKINS (2) and EARLE F. MCBRIDE (3)

Abstract:

The Previous HitporosityNext Hit and packing of 174 samples of surficial and shallowly buried (to 17 m), unconsolidated Holocene sands (medium to coarse-grained) were determined by point counting the upper surface of thin sections of epoxy-impregnated samples in reflected light. Average depositional Previous HitporosityNext Hit for 124 surficial sands from beaches, river point bars and braid bars, and eolian dunes, respectively, is 47, 48, and 49%. The Previous HitporosityNext Hit values range between 40 and 58%. Beach sands exhibit an average packing value (CI = contact index) of 0.79, fluvial sands an average CI of 0.91, and eolian sands an average CI of 1.02.

Beach sands typically contain 5.5% oversized pores, river sands 3.8% oversized pores, and eolian dune sands 4.0% oversized pores. Most oversized pores are depositional packing defects, although trapped air bubbles are common in some beach sands. Extrapolation of our data for buried samples indicates depositional oversized pores are destroyed at a Previous HitdepthNext Hit of less than 100 m.

Average Previous HitporosityNext Hit is 46% for eolian ripple strata, 50% for grain-fall strata, and 51% for grain-flow strata. Differences in packing are significant for grain-flow Previous HitversusNext Hit grain-fall strata and for ripple Previous HitversusNext Hit grain-flow strata for samples of similar grain size.

Previous HitPorosityNext Hit is more uniform within individual beds from a river and a beach than among different beds at the same localities. Previous HitPorosityNext Hit of ancient sandstones from a particular bed or facies may be as uniform as sampled Holocene sands, unless cements having patchy distribution, such as carbonate or anhydrite, are present.

Compaction associated with burial to 17 m is minor. Packing is tighter, but our technique of measuring Previous HitporosityNext Hit is not sensitive enough to show any decrease in Previous HitporosityNext Hit. Changes in packing and Previous HitporosityNext Hit upon burial to common hydrocarbon reservoir depths will depend on individual histories of cementation, compaction, and secondary Previous HitporosityNext Hit development. However, if only physical compaction of quartzose river, dune, and beach sands takes place, Previous HitporosityTop would approach a limiting value of 26% and CI would approach 5.5.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].