About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
1Manuscript received December 14, 1995; revised manuscript
received December 9, 1996; final acceptance June 16, 1997.
2University of Bergen, Geological Institute, Allegaten 47,
N-5007 Bergen, Norway. Present address: Norske Conoco A.S., P.O. Box 288,
N-4001 Stavanger, Norway.
3University of Wyoming, Department of Geology and Geophysics,
Laramie, Wyoming 82071-3355.
We thank our fellow colleagues and research students in the Joule II:
Integrated Basin Studies-Dynamics of the Norwegian Margin (IBS-DNM) project
for stimulating cooperation and discussions. Constructive comments by K.
T. Biddle, C. K. Morley, T. H. Nilsen, and F. Surlyk on an earlier version
of the manuscript sharpened the final product and are greatly appreciated.
The drafting offices at the Geological Survey of Wyoming, Statoil, Norsk
Hydro, and the Geological Institute, University of Bergen, created the
illustrations. This work was funded by the Research Council of Norway as
part of the Joule II Research Programme (CEC Contract No. JOU2-CT92-0110).
For clarification, the term "rift margin depositional system" as used in this paper refers to a geological feature that originates at the rift margin but may extend out into the basin.
ABSTRACT
Marine siliciclastic synrift successions, whether dominantly shallow
or deep marine in nature, are classified in terms of sediment supply as
overfilled, balanced, underfilled, and starved. Sediment-overfilled and
sediment-balanced infill types are characterized by a threefold sandstone-mudstone-
sandstone synrift sediment-infill motif; the sediment-underfilled type
is represented by a two-fold conglomerate-sandstone-mudstone motif; and
the sediment-starved type commonly is represented by a one-fold mudstone
motif. The sequential development, linked depositional systems, and stratigraphic
signatures of the early synrift, the rift climax, and the late synrift
to early postrift stages vary significantly between these rift basin infill
types, as do the tectonic significance (timing of initiation and duration)
of stratal surfaces, such as footwall unconformities, nondepositional hiatuses,
and marine condensed sections. The construction of the fourfold rift basin
infill classification scheme provides a first basis and a strong tool for
predicting the distribution and geometry of synrift reservoir and source
rock types, despite the inherent variability of the marine synrift infills.
Marine rift basins represent a continuum ranging from mixed nonmarine/marine
through shallow marine to deep marine, or from partly emergent through
partly submergent to completely submergent basin types. These rift basin
types have strongly variable synrift sedimentary architectures because
of temporal changes in relative sea level, accommodation creation, and
sediment supply throughout the rift cycle. Accommodation changes are controlled
mainly by local basin-floor rotation, basinwide background subsidence,
and, to a lesser degree, by eustatic changes. Sediment supply determines
how much of the accommodation is filled and in what manner, and is controlled
by the distance to the main hinterland areas, and the size and sediment-
yield potential of any local fault-block source area.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].