About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
of the Gulf of Mexico Basin, South Texas
1Manuscript received June 17, 1996; revised manuscript received
February 24, 1997; final acceptance October 21, 1997.
2University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological
Sciences, Austin, Texas 78712. Current address: Delaware Geological Survey,
University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-7501.
3University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological
Sciences, Austin, Texas 78712.
Funding for this project was provided by the office of Basic Energy
Research of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Donors of The Petroleum
Research Fund, which is administered by the American Chemical Society.
We gratefully acknowledge Rich Ketcham and Mark Cloos for access to the
a-scintillation counter; Lynton Land, Leo Lynch, and Kitty Milliken for
access to their mudrock collection; Larry Mack for analyzing samples to
determine the accuracy of our U and Th measurements; and Steve Ingebritsen,
Larry Lawver, and the three Bulletin reviewers (Stefan Bachu, Dave Blackwell,
and John Sclater) for their reviews of this manuscript.
Data is offered under the AAPG Bulletin Datashare program (Data 10). Users can obtain the data set by downloading the file for free from the Internet (http://www.geobyte.com/download.html).
ABSTRACT
Radiogenic heat production within the sedimentary section of the Gulf
of Mexico basin is a significant source of heat. Radiogenic heat should
be included in thermal models of this basin (and perhaps other sedimentary
basins). We calculate that radiogenic heat may contribute up to 26% of
the overall surface heat-flow density for an area in south Texas. Based
on measurements of the radioactive decay rate of a-particles, potassium
concentration, and bulk density, we calculate radiogenic heat production
for Stuart City (Lower Cretaceous) limestones, Wilcox (Eocene) sandstones
and mudrocks, and Frio (Oligocene) sandstones and mudrocks from south Texas.
Heat production rates range from a low of 0.07 ±0.01 µW/m3
in clean Stuart City limestones to 2.21 ±0.24 µW/m3
in Frio mudrocks. Mean heat production rates for Wilcox sandstones, Frio
sandstones, Wilcox mudrocks, and Frio mudrocks are 0.88, 1.19, 1.50, and
1.72 µW/m3, respectively. In general, the mudrocks produce about
30-40% more heat than stratigraphically equivalent sandstones. Frio rocks
produce about 15% more heat than Wilcox rocks per unit volume of clastic
rock (sandstone/mudrock). A one-dimensional heat- conduction model indicates
that this radiogenic heat source has a significant effect on subsurface
temperatures. If a thermal model were calibrated to observed temperatures
by optimizing basal heat-flow density and ignoring sediment heat production,
the extrapolated present-day temperature of a deeply buried source rock
would be overestimated.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].