About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
1Manuscript received September 25, 1996; revised manuscript
received March 13, 1997; final acceptance November 14, 1997.
2Institut Français du Pétrole, 1, 4 Avenue
de Bois Préau, 92852 Rueil Malmaison, France.
3Esso Rep, 213 Cours Victor-Hugo, B.P. 150, 33321 Bègles,
France.
We are grateful to the Esso Rep management for giving permission to
publish this paper, and to L. Montadert (IFP) for initiating and encouraging
this study. Special thanks go to our colleagues I. Morelon and C. Ravenne
(IFP) and J. M. Chautru (BEICIP) for their help during this work. The paper
has benefited from discussions with S. Bourquin and F. Guillocheau (Rennes
University) about the Paris basin geology. We also thank J. A. Johnson
(Esso Rep) and AAPG reviewers K. T. Biddle, R. L. Chambers, and D. Cox
for helpful suggestions on improving the manuscript. Y. Monteon and A.
Nakou made the drawings.
ABSTRACT
Reservoir modeling of the Chaunoy field was performed by combining
a sedimentological study, a sequence stratigraphic analysis, geostatistical
simulations, and the analysis of production data and fluid-flow simulations.
The reservoir corresponds to the distal part of a Middle Triassic alluvial
fan system in the Paris basin (France), and is extremely heterogeneous
and layered. The reservoir mostly consists of small ribbon channel deposits
interbedded with flood-plain and lacustrine mudstones. The channel amalgamation
rate varied with cyclic lake-level variations, which directly controlled
the reservoir geometry. Within a base-level cycle, during periods of low
accommodation, channels were amalgamated, forming highly heterogeneous
sand sheets. As the accommodation increased, channels became progressively
isolated within flood-plain mudstones. Finally, a lacustrine transgression
deposited lacustrine mudstones and induced thin but widespread vertical
permeability barriers across the field. As accommodation started to decrease,
considerable pedogenetic alteration occurred, as shown by dolocretes and
groundwater dolomites. Five cycles that constituted the reservoir layering
framework were identified. Geostatistical simulations of lithotype distribution
within these units were computed using the truncated random Gaussian function
method. Horizontal and vertical lithotype proportion curves and variograms
were calculated from well data. Because of the wide well spacing, it was
not possible to determine the range of horizontal experimental variograms.
Three lithotype realizations were simulated within a high-resolution grid
to compare short, medium, and long correlation lengths. After assigning
petrophysical properties to the lithotypes and upscaling, fluid-flow simulations
were performed for the three realizations. The three flow simulations were
then compared to the 10-yr production history of the field. The simulations
showed quite a good match regardless of the variogram range, except in
the northern part of the field, indicating a problem in the reservoir layering
in this area. This relative insensibility of the flow simulation to the
correlation length probably is due to the high net pay within the amalgamated
channel reservoir units and to the high number of conditioning wells; however,
the flow simulation performed with the longest correlation length showed
the best fit with the production history.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].