About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
1Manuscript received December 12, 1996; revised manuscript
received January 16, 1998; final acceptance January 20, 1998.
2Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center, Department
of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
3Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center, Department
of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
Present address: Exxon Exploration Company, P.O. Box 9778, Houston, Texas
77210-4778.
4PDVSA Exploracion y Produccion, Gerencia de Planificacionde
Exploracion, Edificio La Estancia, Oficina 1359, Chuac, Caracas, Venezuela.
5PDSVA Exploracion y Production, Piso 14, Ofic. 14115-C,
Avenida La Estancia, Chuao-Caracas 1010A Venezuela.
6Energy and Minerals Applied Research Cent., Department
of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
Present Address: HS Resources Inc., 1999 Broadway, Suite 3600, Denver,
Colorado 80202.
7Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center, Department
of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
Present address: Conoco, P.O. Box 2197, Houston, Texas 77252-2197.
8Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center, Department
of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
Present address: Marathon Oil Company, P.O. Box 3128, Houston, Texas 77252-3128.
We thank the following companies and their representatives for their
support and input as part of the Gulf of Mexico research consortium at
the University of Colorado: Agip, Amoco, Anadarko, BP Exploration, BHP,
Burlington Resources, Chevron USA, CNG, CXY, Conoco, Enterprise, Exxon,
Marathon, Mobil, Occidental, PanCanadian, Pennzoil, Petrobras, Phillips,
Shell, Texaco, Total, Union Pacific, and Unocal. Their support has been
crucial for the success of this research. We extend special thanks to Halliburton
Geophysical (now Western Geophysical), specifically to Bob Graebner, John
Anderson, and Gary White, for the seismic data used in this project. We
are indebted to PaleoData Inc. and Art Waterman for use of their biostratigraphic
data. Digital logs were kindly provided by Marathon (Tricia Santogrossi).
Software donations from GeoQuest, CogniSeis Development (Pat Poe, Roy Kligfield,
Robert Ratliff), Landmark Graphics (Thom Fisher), Platte River Associates
(Jay and China Leonard), and Zeh Graphics (Jerry Martin) are essential
to the success of our study. We are grateful for the reviews by Laurie
Lamar and M. S. Wacker, and AAPG reviewers Kevin Biddle, Robert Mitchum,
Tor Nilsen, and George Ramsayer, all of whom improved the manuscript considerably.
Acknowledgment is made to the donors of the Petroleum Research Fund, administered
by the American Chemical Society, for partial support of this work.
ABSTRACT
This study focuses on the northern Green Canyon and central Ewing Bank
protraction (lease) areas, where the Pliocene-Pleistocene turbidite systems
were mapped using an integrated exploration database. Interpretation of
10,000 km of two-dimensional seismic, 185 well logs, and biostratigraphy
from 180 wells allowed us to define the regional sequence stratigraphic
framework for this area and potential areas for future exploration. A complex
Pliocene-Pleistocene geologic evolution of the area is indicated by the
seismic and geologic facies, depositional rates, nature of turbidite systems,
and sand content.
Significant sand deposits (basin-floor fans) were deposited in most
sequences and directly overlie sequence boundaries. Salt tectonics and
faulting greatly influenced the loci of these fans deposition. Large,
thick fans fill entire salt-withdrawal minibasins at the base of the Pliocene
sequences. In the Pleistocene sequences, where the rate of salt withdrawal
was less, smaller and thinner fans were deposited downdip of faults and
adjacent to shallow salt bodies.
Channel systems, interbedded with overbank shales, constitute most of
the sediments in the sequences. The older sequences contain more channels
and sandier channel fills than the younger sequences. Analysis of all sequences
indicates a complex depositional history where significant sands were deposited
where abrupt decreases in bathymetric gradient are associated with salt
tectonics or faulting.
Neogene turbidite systems are major reservoirs in the northern deep
Gulf of Mexico. Few publications have described the stratigraphic variations
or the three-dimensional geometries of these turbidite systems in detail;
hence, an understanding of the stratigraphic characteristics of the producing
sands is important for deep-water exploration in the Gulf of Mexico and
similar basins worldwide.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].