About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
1Manuscript received September 6, 1996; revised manuscript
received June 23, 1997; final acceptance November 20, 1997.
I thank the following companies and their representatives for their
support and input as part of the Gulf of Mexico Research Consortium at
the University of Colorado: Agip, Amoco, Anadarko, BHP, BP Exploration,
Burlington Resources, CXY Energy, Chevron USA, CNG, Conoco, Exxon, Marathon,
Mobil, Occidental, Pan Canadian, Pennzoil, Petrobras, Phillips, Shell,
Texaco, Total, Union Pacific, and Unocal. I extend special thanks to Halliburton
Geophysical (now Western Geophysical), specifically to Bob Graebner, John
Anderson, and Gary White, for the seismic data used in this project. I
am indebted to PaleoData Inc. and Art Waterman for use of their biostratigraphic
data. Software donations from GeoQuest, CogniSeis Development, Zeh Graphics,
Landmark Graphics, and Platte River Associates were essential to the success
of my study. Acknowledgment is made to the donors of the Petroleum Research
Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society for partial support
of this work. Special thanks go to Paul Weimer, Laurie Lamar, and to the
AAPG reviewers, former Elected Editor Kevin Biddle, Cindy Yeilding, and
Jory Pacht, for their careful reviews. Their comments greatly improved
the manuscript.
2Department of Geological Sciences, Energy and Minerals
Applied Research Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399.
Present address: Exxon Exploration Company, P.O. Box 4778, Houston, Texas
77210-4778.
This paper summarizes the results of a portion of my Ph.D. studies
at the University of Colorado at Boulder. I express my most sincere gratitude
to Paul Weimer, my advisor, for all his encouragement, help, advice, and
support throughout my studies. I thank Mark Rowan for his help with the
structural interpretation, and David Knapp for helping me negotiate the
hurdles of the workstation.
ABSTRACT
The stratal geometries and lithology of the different turbidite elements
were interpreted based on the integrated analysis of well-log data, seismic
facies observed on the vertical seismic profiles, and amplitude distribution
recognized on series of horizon slices and amplitude extraction maps (horizontal
seismic facies). The lithologic interpretation, however, was limited by
the lack of seismic velocity data; the wells were tied to the seismic data
through synthetic seismograms created by integrating the sonic and density
logs.
Three turbidite elements were mapped in the selected upper Pliocene-lower
Pleistocene interval of the study area: basin-floor fan (amalgamated depositional
lobes), erosional and depositional channels, and overbank sediments. Lobe-shaped
high-amplitude areas (onlapping high-amplitude continuous reflections on
seismic profiles) indicate laterally continuous, sheetlike deposition,
interpreted as turbidite lobes. Elongated sinuous high-amplitude areas
(high-amplitude discontinuous reflections) correspond to depositional channel
systems. Sinuous low-amplitude areas in generally high-amplitude areas
(e.g., sequence boundaries) reflect the erosional channels. The depositional
channels are interpreted to be filled with sands; the shale-filled erosional
channels are interpreted as conduits for sediments bypassing farther down
slope. The detailed 3-D seismic interpretation allowed description of the
characteristics of the channel systems, analysis of their evolution through
2 m.y., and determination of the controls on the variations in turbidite
deposition. Widespread low- to moderate-amplitude areas without dominant
amplitude patterns are interpreted as overbank deposits.
The turbidite elements identified in this study, including basin-floor
fans (depositional lobes) and channel systems, form the reservoirs in the
fields of the study area and in many other fields and discoveries of the
northern Gulf of Mexico. The geometries of the sand-rich turbidite elements
mapped in this study are considered to be good analogs for these producing
fields and some exploration targets. The results of this study also can
be used as analogs for the description of reservoir architecture in the
subsalt trend of the Gulf of Mexico and in other deep- water exploration
areas.
Interpreting three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data is of great value
in high-grading prospects in frontier exploration areas in the Gulf of
Mexico. This technique is now routinely used to reduce the exploration
and production risks associated with turbidite reservoirs. A subregional
3-D seismic data set was used in this study to describe the Pliocene- Pleistocene
turbidite systems in three intraslope minibasins in the north-central Green
Canyon protraction area of the Gulf of Mexico.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].