About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
Paul
Weimer,2
Bruce D. Trudgill,2 Mark G. Rowan,2 Peter E. Gale,3
Ronald L. Phair,4 Bryant E. Korn,4 Geneva R. Roberts,5
William T. Gafford,5 Roger S. Lowe,6 and Tomas A.
Queffelec
1Manuscript received January 21, 1998; revised manuscript
received August 27, 1998; final acceptance October 3, 1998.
2Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center, Department
of Geological Sciences, Campus Box 399, University of Colorado, Boulder,
Colorado 80309-0399; e-mail: carl@emarc.colorado.edu
3Shell Deep Water Business Unit, P.O. Box 61993, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70160. Present address: British-Borneo Exploration, Inc., 1201
Louisiana, Suite 3500, Houston, Texas 77002.
4Texaco Exploration and Production Inc., P.O. Box 60252,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70160.
5Amoco Production Company., P.O. Box 3092, Houston, Texas
77253.
6Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc., 1250 Poydras,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113.
ABSTRACT
Analysis of 12,000 km of two-dimensional multifold seismic data shows
a thick succession of Mesozoic and Cenozoic deep-water strata in the Perdido
fold belt, northwestern deep Gulf of Mexico. These strata differ in seismic
facies, areal distribution, and reservoir/petroleum potential. Mesozoic
strata are interpreted as dominantly fine-grained carbonates and show minor
thickness changes. Cenozoic strata are largely mud-dominated siliciclastic
turbidite deposits and vary considerably in thickness across the fold belt.
These changes reflect the shifting position of Cenozoic marginal-marine
depocenters.
Mesozoic reservoir potential consists of fractured Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous deep-water carbonates. Cenozoic reservoir potential consists of siliciclastic deep-water turbidites. Portions of the Paleocene to lower Eocene strata are sand-prone and are the downdip equivalents of the lower and upper Wilcox shallow-marine depocenters. These strata are all incorporated within the folds. Lower to middle Oligocene strata coincide with the main growth phase of the fold belt. Potentially sand-prone middle Oligocene to lower Miocene strata are the downdip equivalents of the Vicksburg (early Oligocene), Frio (Oligocene), and Oakville (early Miocene) shallow-water depocenters. These strata form potential stratigraphic traps against the folds.
Mesozoic source potential was modeled assuming Oxfordian, Tithonian, Barremian, and Turonian source beds. One-dimensional thermal maturation modeling showed these sources reached peak oil generation between 51 and 39 Ma, 39 and 8 Ma, 32 and 2 Ma, and 26 and 8 Ma, respectively. Cenozoic source potential was modeled using an Eocene source. Modeling showed this source reached only early oil generation in the basinward half of the fold belt. Thermal maturation was reached by source beds at different times in different locations due to changes in burial depth, amount of structural uplift, and underlying thickness of autochthonous salt. All of these factors indicate that seal and reservoir carry significant risk, but that the potential exists for large petroleum accumulations.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at members@aapg.org.