About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 83, No. 12 (December 1999), P. 1965-1979.

Thermal and Maturation Modeling of the Urengoy Field, West Siberian Basin: Some Special Considerations in Basin Modeling 1

Yurii Galushkin, 2 Olga Simonenkova, 3 and Nikolai Lopatin3

©Copyright 1999. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
1Manuscript received October 7, 1997; revised manuscript received October 28, 1998; final acceptance May 30, 1999.
2Moscow State University, Geology Museum, 119899, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]
3Geosystems Institute, Varshavskoye Shosse 8, 113105, Moscow, Russia; fax (095) 954 54 00.
We gratefully thank AAPG Elected Editor Neil Hurley for his suggestions and guidelines for improving the manuscript. We are very thankful to Harald S. Poelchau for valuable comments that helped us improve the scientific and semantic content of the paper. We are indebted to Gary Isaksen who carefully reviewed the manuscript, revised the text, and provided many helpful suggestions.

ABSTRACT

Present-day temperature and vitrinite reflectance (Ro) profiles are considered key factors for calibration in numerical basin modeling; therefore, it is important to understand how such profiles are generated. Basin modeling typically considers factors such as rock consolidation, depth-variation of petrophysical characteristics, changes in heat flow, and paleoclimate; however, our basin evaluations have shown that other processes that influence temperature and Ro (vitrinite reflectance) profiles commonly are inadequately studied. Modeling within the Urengoy field of the West Siberian basin has allowed numerical estimates of some of these nonstandard processes. First, a substantial increase in temperature (up to 5-10¡C) is expected from changes in heat conductivity due to the formation of significant free gas, gas-condensate, and condensate. Second, climate variations creating numerous periods of formation and degradation of permafrost zones for the last 3.4 m.y. could decrease the modern rock temperatures by 10-17¡C in the upper 1.5 km of the sedimentary section and up to 10¡C at its base. Due to the short duration of these two processes, their Previous HiteffectTop on organic matter maturation is minimal; nevertheless, their roles in the formation of present-day temperature profiles necessitate their inclusion in basin modeling. Third, modeling results demonstrated that change in heat conductivity of rocks with dispersed organic matter can increase temperature of sedimentary rocks by 3-5¡C and rock maturity by not more than 0.02% (Ro). Finally, the sharp increase in vitrinite reflectance (% Ro) with depth, typical for the deep sedimentary units of the Urengoy field and many other continental rift basins, is possible to explain from hydrothermal activity. The influence of these processes on subsurface temperatures and maturation of organic matter can vary significantly depending on lithology, organic matter content, and the location of the modeled section relative to the ancient rift system. The results of this study can help one estimate the relative influence of these parameters.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].