About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
Displacement distributions on extensional faults: Implications for
fault
stretch, linkage, and seal


S. A. Stewart1
1Upstream Technology Group, BP, Burnside Road, Farburn Industrial Estate, Dyce, Aberdeen AB21 7PB, United Kingdom; email: stewartsa1@bp.com
AUTHORS
Simon Stewart completed a Ph.D. at Imperial College, London, on the structural geology and paleomagnetism of the Carboniferous thrust belt in north Spain. Since then he has spent eight years at Amerada Hess on various North Sea teams, working mainly on three-dimensional (3-D) seismic interpretation. In 2000 he joined BP as a structural geologist, working on the application of integrated drilling, geomechanical, and seismic data. His special interests include the relationship between mechanostratigraphy and structural style and development of 3-D seismic interpretation work flows for fast, accurate mapping.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This article benefited from reviews by R. Schlische and G. Yielding and comments from J. Cartwright and J. Underhill. I thank T. Wynn for assisting with programming. The mapping shown in Figure 6a is by J. Argent. I thank Veritas DGC for permission to show seismic data. The views expressed here are solely my own and do not necessarily represent those of Amerada Hess Ltd. or BP.
ABSTRACT
Most extensional faults are characterized by displacement distri
butions that range from zero at the fault
tips to a maximum value at some point along the length of the
fault
. Regardless of the pattern of displacement distribution, a geometrical requirement resulting from the displacement variation along the
fault
is that beds must stretch parallel with the strike of the
fault
. It has been suggested that minor faults and fractures evolve perpendicular to the main
fault
to accommodate this stretch. The amount of stretch that this subpopulation of faults must accommodate is quantified here using several alternative displacement
profile
models. The choice of pro
file model is much less significant than the ratio of maximum displacement to
fault
length (Dmax/L). The amount of stretch rapidly increases from about 0.7% at Dmax/L of 0.05 to about 3% at the typical upper limit for Dmax/L of 0.1. These relationships predict tens to hundreds of meters of
fault
-parallel stretch associated with kilometer-scale extensional faults. The size and spatial distribution of stretch accommodation faults should be incorporated in three-dimensional (3-D)
fault
zone models, and there are several implications for
fault
linkage and seal. One possible strain accommodation scenario is that a small number of faults that have displacements significant enough to generate reservoir-juxtaposition leak points could exist. Alternatively, a subseismic
fault
and fracture population could either significantly degrade horizontal permeability parallel with the major
fault
or, if open, constitute a target for high-angle exploitation drilling. The intersections between the stretch accommodation faults and the main
fault
could provide conduits for
fault
valving or low-entry pressure leak points. The most commonly observed candidate stretch accommodation faults occur in
fault
overlap zones in segmented
fault
systems, coincident with maximum displacement gradients on the
fault
planes. In these cases, cutoff stretch accommodation could be an integral factor in
fault
segment linkage.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at members@aapg.org.