About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
Resource-assessment perspectives for unconventional
gas
systems
gas
systems
James W. Schmoker1
1U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 939, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225; email: [email protected]
AUTHORS
James W. Schmoker, Ph.D., is an emeritus scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, where he has spent the last decade working on issues of petroleum resource assessment. He has contributed to the methodology used by the U.S. Geological Survey in many of their recent oil and
gas
assessments and is particularly interested in the geologic nature and approaches to resource assessment of continuous (unconventional) oil and
gas
accumulations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank members of recent U.S. Geological Survey Petroleum Resource Assessment teams for the data, ideas, and suggestions they contributed. Constructive comments and reviews were provided by Ben E. Law, Ronald R. Charpentier, Brian W. Horn, and Gordon L. Dolton.
ABSTRACT
Concepts are described for assessing those unconventional
gas
sys
tems that can also be defined as continuous accumulations. Contin
uous
gas
accumulations exist more or less independently of the wa
ter column and do not owe their existence directly to the buoyancy of
gas
in water. They cannot be represented in terms of individual, countable fields or pools delineated by downdip water contacts. For these reasons, traditional resource-assessment methods based on es
timating the sizes and numbers of undiscovered discrete fields can
not be applied to continuous accumulations. Specialized assessment methods are required.
Unconventional
gas
systems that are also continuous accumu
lations include coalbed methane,
basin
-
centered
gas
, so-called tight
gas
, fractured shale (and chalk)
gas
, and
gas
hydrates. Deep-basin and bacterial
gas
systems may or may not be continuous accumu
lations, depending on their geologic setting.
Two basic resource-assessment approaches have been em
ployed for continuous accumulations. The first approach is based on estimates of
gas
in place. A volumetric estimate of total
gas
in place is commonly coupled with an overall recovery factor to nar
row the assessment scope from a treatment of
gas
volumes residing in sedimentary strata to a prediction of potential additions to re
serves. The second approach is based on the production perfor
mance of continuous
gas
reservoirs, as shown empirically by wells and reservoir-simulation models. In these methods, production characteristics (as opposed to
gas
in place) are the foundation for forecasts of potential additions to reserves.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].