About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
2011. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
DOI:10.1306/06301010004
Primary basins and their boundaries in the deep-water northern Gulf of Mexico: Origin, trap types, and petroleum
system
implications
system
implications
Robin S. Pilcher,1 Bill Kilsdonk,2 James Trude3
1Hess Corporation, One Allen Center, 500 Dallas Street, Houston, Texas 77002; [email protected]
2Hess Corporation, One Allen Center, 500 Dallas Street, Houston, Texas 77002
3Hess Corporation, One Allen Center, 500 Dallas Street, Houston, Texas 77002
ABSTRACT
Primary basins form stratigraphically continuous successions on autochthonous salt and, therefore, in the northern Gulf of Mexico, contain all the components of a petroleum
system
(source, reservoir, trap, and seal). Most primary basins are encased entirely in salt or in some combination of salt and welds. Petroleum exploration in the deep-water Gulf of Mexico is currently focused on primary
basin
targets and increasingly those at their lateral boundaries. However, as these boundaries are commonly poorly imaged, robust structural models are critical to interpretation of their structural evolution and relative petroleum
system
risk. Using three-dimensional seismic data, we define three tectonostratigraphic provinces that characterize primary
basin
depocenters: (1) a disconnected salt-stock-canopy
province
in Mississippi Canyon; (2) an amalgamated salt-stock-canopy
province
in northern Atwater Valley, southeastern Green Canyon, Walker Ridge, and southern Keathley Canyon; and (3) a bucket-weld
province
in western Green Canyon, Garden Banks, and northern Keathley Canyon. We recognize six trap types in the primary basins: (1) autochthonous salt-cored folds, (2) turtle structures, (3) base-of-salt truncations, (4) salt feeders, (5) salt ridges, and (6) bucket welds. Most primary
basin
explorations to date have targeted traps in one of the first four styles. Future primary
basin
exploration will increasingly focus on the traps formed by bucket welds and salt-cored ridges. The contrasting evolution of these features has implications for reservoir continuity, charge access, and trap configuration. Of primary
basin
boundary trap types, salt feeders have the lowest petroleum
system
risk followed by bucket welds, with salt-cored ridges having the highest risk.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].