About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 95, No. 8 (August 2011), P. 13831397.

Copyright copy2011. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/12031010065

Previous HitFaultNext Hit zone deformation and displacement partitioning in mechanically layered carbonates: The Hidden Valley Previous HitfaultNext Hit, central Texas

David A. Ferrill,1 Alan P. Morris,2 Ronald N. McGinnis,3 Kevin J. Smart,4 William C. Ward5

1Department of Earth, Material, and Planetary Sciences, Geosciences and Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78238; [email protected]
2Department of Earth, Material, and Planetary Sciences, Geosciences and Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78238; [email protected]
3Department of Earth, Material, and Planetary Sciences, Geosciences and Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78238; [email protected]
4Department of Earth, Material, and Planetary Sciences, Geosciences and Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78238; [email protected]
5Deceased

ABSTRACT

The Hidden Valley Previous HitfaultNext Hit is exposed in Canyon Lake Gorge (central Texas) and cuts the Cretaceous Glen Rose Formation. This exposure provides an opportunity to explore the relationship between deformation mechanisms and Previous HitfaultNext Hit displacement along 830 m (2723 ft) of a normal Previous HitfaultNext Hit typical of those in carbonate reservoirs and aquifers around the world. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone has five domains: gently deformed footwall damage zone, intensely deformed footwall damage zone, Previous HitfaultNext Hit core, intensely deformed hanging-wall damage zone, and gently deformed hanging-wall damage zone. Footwall deformation is more intense and laterally extensive than hanging-wall deformation, and the intensely deformed hanging-wall damage zone is narrow and locally absent. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit core contains thin clay-rich gouge or smear in most places but is locally represented by only a slickensided surface between limestone layers. The 55- to 63-m (180–207-ft) Previous HitfaultNext Hit throw across a 43- to 98-m (141- to 322-ft)-wide Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone is accommodated by slip along the Previous HitfaultNext Hit core, layer tilting (synthetic dip development) in footwall and hanging-wall damage zones, and distributed faulting in footwall and hanging-wall damage zones. Total offset across the Previous HitfaultNext Hit overestimates actual Previous HitstratigraphicNext Hit offset by 8 to 12 m (26–39 ft) or about 14 to 21%. In our Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit, the Hidden Valley Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone records both early extensional folding of the Glen Rose Formation and subsequent normal faulting that propagated downward from the overlying competent Edwards Group. The damage zone width is thus established before Previous HitfaultTop breakthrough.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].