About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 96, No. 3 (March 2012), P. 399413.

Copyright copy2012. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/06021111020

Model for how microbial methane generation can preserve early porosity in dolomite and limestone reservoirs

Paul A. Kenward,1 Robert H. Goldstein,2 Andrea E. Brookfield,3 Luis A. Gonzalez,4 Jennifer A. Roberts5

1Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Multidisciplinary Research Building, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; [email protected]
2Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, 120 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, Kansas 66045; [email protected]
3Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; [email protected]
4Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Multidisciplinary Research Building, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; [email protected]
5Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Multidisciplinary Research Building, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66047; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

In some dolomite and limestone hydrocarbon reservoirs, protection from cementation is a primary factor in porosity preservation. We present a model in which methanogens (methane-producing microorganisms) produce methane gas (CH4[g]) that outgasses from solution in pore space, creating a two-Previous HitphaseNext Hit system that reduces effective hydraulic conductivity (K), protecting pore space from cementation. Methanogens have been implicated in dolomite formation and can generate methane to fill pore space of a model near-surface carbonate sediment (37.5% primary porosity) with CH4(g) in 180 to 4650 yr, depending on nutrient levels. Gas generation results in occlusion of the aqueous Previous HitphaseNext Hit from pore spaces and throats, creating a two-Previous HitphaseTop flow regime, reducing the effective hydraulic conductivity of model marine carbonate sand by about 50% (from 2.8 to 1.2 cm/day) in as little as 55 yr, therefore reducing aqueous fluid flow necessary for cementation.

Despite rapid burial and complete cessation of methanogenesis, effective hydraulic conductivity could take more than 100,000 yr to return to its original value. If methanogenesis continues with burial, the effective hydraulic conductivity is reduced to zero (after 250 yr). Dolomites can preserve more primary porosity with depth than other carbonates. We propose that, in addition to increased structural resistance, a biogenic model exists for porosity preservation in dolomites that is linked to the activity of methanogens. This model represents specific end-member cases and illustrates the effect of methane buildup in relationship to the extent of reservoir diagenesis.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].