About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 97, No. 10 (October 2013), P. 17851803.

Copyright copy2013. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/04221312086

Recognition criteria for distinguishing between hemipelagic and pelagic mudrocks in the characterization of deep-water reservoir heterogeneity

Jesus Ochoa,1 Jeannette Wolak,2 Michael H. Gardner3

1Marathon Oil Corporation, 5555 San Felipe Street, Houston, Texas; [email protected]
2Tennessee Tech University, 1 William L. Jones Drive, Cookeville, Tennessee; [email protected]
3Montana State University, Traphagen Hall #200, Bozeman, Montana; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Determination of turbidite event magnitude and frequency remains subjective and difficult to define. This is because turbidite sedimentation events commonly include both sand and mud, with the mud component commonly excluded from bed thickness studies because of the inability to establish a genetic link to the turbidity current. Pelagic mudrock is defined as fine-grained marine sediment derived primarily from biogenic particles, whereas hemipelagic mudrock includes both biogenic and terrigenous particles. Unfortunately, these compositional definitions do not account for differences in depositional process.

Scanning electron microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction analyses of 70 samples from El Rosario Formation outcrops (Baja California, Mexico) and core from the Woodford Shale (Oklahoma) illustrate this distinction. Furthermore, these laboratory measurements are calibrated to 192 outcrop samples to provide a robust method for field identification of clay fabric and mineralogy to define turbidite sedimentation units.

Pelagites show organized layering of clay platelets, few flocculates, and a lower proportion of high-density minerals. Hemipelagites have disorganized and chaotic clay fabrics characterized by visible flocculates and contain a higher proportion of denser particles. There may also be a corresponding change in clay mineralogy, for example, smectite in pelagites versus kaolinite in hemipelagites. These results indicate a settling velocity greater than shear velocity in pelagites, whereas hemipelagites record the opposite condition. Turbidity currents support and suspend denser grains, generate disorganized and chaotic clay fabrics, and provide more time for flocculation. Discrimination between pelagites and hemipelagites has important implications in the determination of turbidite event frequency and magnitude, which affects vertical connectivity and continuity of sand, deposited from multipartite turbidity currents. In addition, distinction between pelagites and hemipelagites provides a better understanding of mudrock reservoir architecture.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].