About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 98, No. 5 (May 2014), P. 893909.

Copyright copy2014. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1306/10011313054

Deltaic deposits formed under spatially and temporally variable accommodation regimes: A plausible alternative explanation for isolated shallow-marine sandstone bodies

Christopher R. Fielding,1 Andrew J. Hutsky,2 and Trevor J. Hurd3

1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340; [email protected]
2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340; [email protected]
3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Previous HitSequenceTop-stratigraphic concepts and nomenclature are predicated on the assumption that at any time, accommodation conditions are in phase across a depositional basin. In certain situations, however, such as in evolving retroarc foreland basins, the sense of accommodation may be spatially variable because of the growth of intrabasinal structures. Herein, we present evidence for the accumulation of a fluvially dominated deltaic sandstone under strong forcing from spatially and temporally variable low accommodation within the Cretaceous western Cordilleran foreland basin of North America. The Peay Sandstone Member is a coarsening-upward sandstone body (BLTN13054eq1 [BLTN13054eq2] thick) that is extensive across much of the eastern half of the present-day Bighorn Basin of Wyoming. It is remarkable for its elongate planform geometry, extending many tens of kilometers across the basin, and for distal thickening patterns that are, at face value, difficult to reconcile with conventional facies models for deltaic systems. The sandstone shows some of the characteristics of falling-stage and lowstand deltas (extending far into the basin from the contemporary shoreline to the west, lack of a preserved delta-plain topset) but is not incised into its substrate and does not show a descending regressive trajectory with respect to underlying strata. We submit that the Peay Sandstone Member was formed under a regime of both temporally and spatially variable accommodation forced by the heterogeneous growth of the forebulge within the western Cordilleran foreland basin and suggest that the origin of some other apparently isolated sandstone bodies in this and other basins might also be explained in a similar manner.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].