About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

DOI: 10.1306/11141414080

Petroleum generation kinetics: Single versus multiple heating-ramp open-system pyrolysis

Kenneth E. Peters,1 Alan K. Burnham,2 and Clifford C. Walters3

1Schlumberger Information Solutions, 18 Manzanita Place, Mill Valley, California 94941; Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305; [email protected]
2American Shale Oil, LLC, 4221 Findlay Way, Livermore, California 94550; [email protected]; [email protected]
3ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co., 1545 Route 22 East, Annandale, Clinton, New Jersey 08801-0998; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Some recent publications promote one-run, open-system pyrolysis experiments using a single heating rate (ramp) and fixed frequency factor to determine the petroleum generation kinetics of source-rock samples because, compared to multiple-ramp experiments, the method is faster, less expensive, and presumably yields similar results. Some one-ramp pyrolysis experiments yield kinetic results similar to those from multiple-ramp experiments. However, our data for 52 worldwide source rocks containing types I, II, IIS, II/III, and III kerogen illustrate that one-ramp kinetics introduce the potential for significant error that can be avoided by using high-quality kinetic measurements and multiple-ramp experiments in which the frequency factor is optimized by the kinetic software rather than fixed at some universal value. The data show that kinetic modeling based on a discrete activation energy distribution and three different pyrolysis temperature ramps closely approximates that determined from additional runs, provided the three ramps span an appropriate range of heating rates. For some source rocks containing well-preserved kerogen and having narrow activation energy distributions, both single- and multiple-ramp discrete models are insufficient, and nucleation-growth models are necessary. Instrument design, thermocouple size or orientation, and sample weight likely influence the acceptable upper limit of pyrolysis heating rate. Caution is needed for ramps of 30–50°C/min, which can cause temperature errors due to impaired heat transfer between the oven, sample, and thermocouple. Compound volatility may inhibit pyrolyzate yield at the lowest heating rates, depending on the effectiveness of the gas sweep. We recommend at least three pyrolysis ramps that span at least a 20-fold variation of comparatively lower rates, such as 1, 5, and 25°C/min. The product of heating rate and sample size should not exceed ∼100 mg °C/min. Our results do not address the more fundamental questions of whether kinetic models based on multiple-ramp open-system pyrolysis are mechanistically appropriate for use in basin simulators or whether petroleum migration through the kerogen network, rather than cracking of organic matter, represents the rate-limiting step in expulsion.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].