About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 101, No. 9 (September 2017), P. 1473-1486.

Copyright ©2017. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved. Green Open Access. This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license.

DOI: 10.1306/11301616084

Event-based risk management for subsurface risks: An approach to protect value generation from oil and gas fields

P. Craig Smalley,1 and Konstantin Chebotar2

1BP Exploration, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, TW16 7LN, United Kingdom; present address: Department of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; [email protected]
2BP Exploration, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, TW16 7LN, United Kingdom; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Event-based risk management (EBRM) is an improved way of describing subsurface uncertainties and their possible business impacts in a manner that facilitates specific actions to improve business performance. In EBRM, uncertainties are viewed as potential causes of risk events that could in turn lead to consequences that affect the attainment of objectives. This “causes–event–consequences” syntax aids the design of prevention measures to inhibit the causes turning into the event and mitigation measures to reduce the potential consequences should the risk event occur, and it also facilitates construction of a risk taxonomy scheme based on risk consequences, events, and causes.

Using a data set of 1456 subsurface risks, each risk was described in this manner and placed in the taxonomy, and the proportion of risks in each taxonomic group was analyzed. This revealed clear trends in the relative frequency of risk groups with type of field: for example, risks related to hydrocarbon-in-place volumes are more frequently identified in deep-water oil fields and gas fields feeding liquefied natural gas plants, situations in which resource volumes are critical to support the large project capital costs. Trends were also evident with field maturity: for example, risks related to hydrocarbon-in-place volumes are more frequently identified before the field sanction decision than afterward.

Several benefits have yielded from EBRM: the risk description syntax encourages the creation of meaningful risk-management actions, the taxonomy and associated risk identification frequencies assist the identification of relevant risks so that key risk areas are not overlooked and also help to anticipate future risks, and the focus on risks (rather than uncertainties) helps to focus resources (data acquisition, technical studies) onto those aspects of the subsurface that are likely to impact business outcomes.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].