About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
DOI: 10.1306/01251716053
Reevaluation of thermal maturity and stages of petroleum formation of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, Texas
M. D. Lewan,1 and M. J. Pawlewicz2
1US Geological Survey (Emeritus), Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25046 MS 977, Denver, Colorado 80225; [email protected] and [email protected]
2US Geological Survey (Retired), Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25046 MS 977, Denver, Colorado 80225; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
New data including measured reflectance (%Ro), programmed open-system pyrolysis data, and kerogen elemental analyses obtained on the Mississippian Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas, indicate that secondary-gas generation starts at 1.5% Ro and not at the previously prescribed 1.1% Ro. Oil-cracking kinetic parameters derived from pyrolysis experiments in the presence and absence of water indicate that secondary-gas generation will not occur at a thermal maturity as low as 1.1% Ro and requires a minimum thermal maturity of 1.5% Ro. This difference is especially important in using the Barnett Shale as an analog for evaluating other possible shale-gas plays. The new reflectance measurements have a good relationship with hydrogen indices (HIs) and compare well with other published data sets. However, the relationship does not compare well with the previously published data used to prescribe 1.1% Ro as the start of secondary-gas generation in the Barnett Shale. This discrepancy is attributed to differences in measured %Ro values and not attributed to differences in the HI values. Lack of publicly available information on the previously reported %Ro values makes it difficult to ascertain the reason for their lower values. These lower %Ro values also have impact on the previously prescribed relationship for estimating %Ro from the temperature at maximum yield by programmed open-system pyrolysis (Tmax). As a result, the new data do not agree with a previously described relationship, and the considerable scatter makes the new relationship unreliable. However, the relationship between the HI and %Ro has less scatter, which indicates that HI offers a better proxy in calculating %Ro than Tmax for the Barnett Shale. Comparison of various programmed open-system pyrolysis methods (i.e., Rock-Eval II, Rock-Eval 6, Source Rock Analyzer, and Hawk) indicates that variations in HI are within ±10% of one another. An HI of at least 44 mg/g total organic carbon is prescribed as a more certain limit for the start of secondary-gas generation and prospective in situ gas-shale accumulations.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].