About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
DOI: 10.1306/0726171609317002
Integrating
borehole
image logs with core: A method to enhance subsurface fracture characterization
![Previous Hit](/data/images/arrow_left.gif)
![Next Hit](/data/images/arrow_right.gif)
F. Fernández-Ibáñez,1 J. M. DeGraff,2 and F. Ibrayev3
1ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, 22777 Springwoods Village Parkway, Spring, Texas 77389; [email protected]
2ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, 22777 Springwoods Village Parkway, Spring, Texas 77389; [email protected]
3North Caspian Operating Company, Chagala District, 01 Smagulov Street, 060002 Atyrau, Kazakhstan; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Image logs provide critical data for characterizing fractured reservoirs. However, the nature of such logs, coupled with borehole
-modified stresses, creates challenges that may lead to erroneous fracture interpretations. We developed a methodology to integrate image logs, core, and geomechanical models to obtain high-confidence, fracture data sets derived from image logs. The methodology starts with a detailed comparison of overlapping image logs and core, first to properly shift them into alignment (core-to-log shift) and second to determine which features interpreted as fractures on image logs (picks) can be validated as fractures in core. Then we derive guidelines for interpreting image logs without core control to reduce the likelihood of false fracture picks. Geomechanical modeling is used to assist with quality control and interpretation of image logs where drilling-induced tensile fractures occur. We use a fractured carbonate reservoir to demonstrate the application of this methodology. Comparison of image log fracture picks with core led to an average rejection rate of greater than 50% of fractures picked on the image logs. These high rejection rates are mostly caused by overinterpretation of discontinuous sinusoids and misidentification of sedimentary features and induced fractures. We derived rules for interpreting high-quality fractures: (1) only sinusoids with continuity greater than 50% should be interpreted and (2) sinusoids with dip angles less than 55° should be excluded from the interpretation. Application of this methodology has provided much higher quality fracture orientation and frequency data than that resulting from interpretation of
borehole
images alone. The improved fracture data set provides a more reliable basis for testing hypotheses and deriving models of fracture distribution.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].