About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

DOI: 10.1306/02251917057

Resolution limits of fluid overpressures Previous HitfromNext Hit mineralogy, porosity, and sonic velocity variations in North Sea mudrocks

Christian Hermanrud,1 and Oddgeir Undertun2

1Equinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; [email protected]
2Equinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Pore pressure identification in mudrocks largely relies on indirect methods, including analyses of sonic velocity data. The magnitude of pore pressure changes that can be resolved Previous HitfromNext Hit such data depends on the impact of fluid pressures on well log responses and on the velocity responses to lithological variations that could be mistaken for indications of pore pressure changes.

Analysis of relationships between sonic velocity, mineralogy, and porosity Previous HitfromNext Hit 11 North Sea wells demonstrated porosity variations of up to 5% Previous HitfromNext Hit the mean value in mudrocks at any given depth between 1 and 3.5 km (3300–11,500 ft). Comparisons of these wells with seven wells Previous HitfromNext Hit the Norwegian Sea demonstrated that the sonic velocity and density variations are influenced by the content of silica with a biogenic origin, but that they can otherwise not, in general, be related to mineralogy and pore pressure variations. The sonic velocity deviations Previous HitfromNext Hit the mean value are of the same magnitude as those that would be caused by porosity changes of ±8% in mudrocks of uniform lithology. Furthermore, the deviations are not significantly reduced when the velocity data are compensated for changes in density (porosity).

Detection limits for mechanically compacting mudrocks that are at their maximum effective stress are equivalent to static mud density changes of 0.1–0.15 g/cm3. These numbers apply to mudrocks with similar lithological variability to those analyzed in our data set but should be much higher when significant amounts of silica with a biogenic origin are present. The impact of effective stress changes on the sonic velocities of chemically compacting as well as of mechanically unloading rocks is much less because small or no porosity changes follow Previous HitfromNext Hit the effective stress changes in such cases. The velocity responses for mechanically unloading and stress-insensitive chemical compaction can only be identified Previous HitfromNext Hit four-dimensional (time-lapse) seismic data unless the rocks are close to the fracturing limit. These observations imply that reasonably accurate velocity-based pore pressure identification in North Sea mudrocks requires a knowledge of local mudrock heterogeneity and compaction that cannot easily be obtained. As a result, sonic velocity data should be treated with considerable caution in pore pressure evaluation.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].