The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Figure
AAPG Bulletin; Year: 2020; Issue: May DOI: 10.1306/10031919011
Return to Full Text
Figure 3. Regional basin development and structure. (A) An uninterpreted regional two-dimensional (2-D) seismic reflection line (2-D line A) showing the basin and ridge structure across the study area. (B) An interpreted regional 2-D seismic reflection line (2-D line A) showing nine mega-unit (Mu) horizons that have been modified from Gregersen et al. (2013, 2016, 2019) as well as rift stage interpretations. Also shown are interpretations of possible source-rock kitchens and updip migration pathways within the Cretaceous Mu F. (C) A seismic reflection intersection from the high-resolution three-dimensional survey along the 2-D line trajectory (location shown in (B)) to show the location of the main mass transport deposit (MTD) reservoir studied as well as the polarity comparison of the top reservoir and seabed. The 2-D seismic line location is shown in Figure 1. TWT = two-way time.
Figure 3. Regional basin development and structure. (A) An uninterpreted regional two-dimensional (2-D) seismic reflection line (2-D line A) showing the basin and ridge structure across the study area. (B) An interpreted regional 2-D seismic reflection line (2-D line A) showing nine mega-unit (Mu) horizons that have been modified from Gregersen et al. (2013, 2016, 2019) as well as rift stage interpretations. Also shown are interpretations of possible source-rock kitchens and updip migration pathways within the Cretaceous Mu F. (C) A seismic reflection intersection from the high-resolution three-dimensional survey along the 2-D line trajectory (location shown in (B)) to show the location of the main mass transport deposit (MTD) reservoir studied as well as the polarity comparison of the top reservoir and seabed. The 2-D seismic line location is shown in Figure 1. TWT = two-way time.