About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
DOI: 10.1306/07132218243
The main geological factors controlling the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas content
Yijun Zheng,1 Yuhong Liao,2 Yunpeng Wang,3 Yongqiang Xiong,4 and Ping’an Peng5
1State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; zhengyijun@gig.ac.cn, zyjln123@sina.com
2State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; liaoyh@gig.ac.cn
3State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; wangyp@gig.ac.cn
4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; xiongyq@gig.ac.cn
5State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; pinganp@gig.ac.cn
ABSTRACT
Changning and Fuling are two of the best-known shale gas fields in China, located at two different depositional centers of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation to the lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin. However, there are significant differences in the gas content of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales between these two areas, despite their similar average total organic carbon contents and thickness. To elucidate the main factors responsible for the differences in the shale gas content between Changning and Fuling, two shallow wells were drilled to investigate their mineralogical and petrophysical properties as well as the organic matter–associated pore structure of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales. A comparison of these reservoir properties was also made with those of the Jiaoye 4 well from the Fuling shale gas field. Because the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in these two areas were deposited within different sedimentary environments and experienced different tectonic intensities, the present study focused mainly on investigating whether and how these differences have affected the petrophysical properties of the shale interval. The results indicated that intensive carbonate cementation in Changning significantly reduced the total pore volume and total specific surface area of the shale interval, and thus degraded the reservoir connectivity. However, compared with the Fuling field, a relatively weak tectonic compaction deformation in the Changning field was beneficial to the preservation of pore volume. Therefore, more intensive carbonate cementation may have been one critical geological factor responsible for the lower gas content in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale reservoirs in the southern Sichuan Basin.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at members@aapg.org.