About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
DOI: 10.1306/08122524082
Formation, preservation, and release of overpressure in shale gas reservoirs
Qing He,1 Tian Dong,2 Matthew Steele-MacInnis,3 Zhiliang He,4 and Dongfeng Hu5
1Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei, China; Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; [email protected]
2Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei, China; [email protected]
3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; [email protected]
4Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei, China; [email protected]
5Sinopec Exploration Branch Company, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Formation and evolution of fluid overpressure is critical to the generation, migration, and accumulation of natural gas. However, one aspect of this process that has received little attention so far is how and why fluid overpressure in shales is either preserved or dissipated. Here, we investigate the generation and preservation of fluid overpressure in different parts of the Wufeng–Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan Basin, China. These rocks represent a good test case to understand preservation versus loss of overpressure because different drill holes into the same stratigraphic unit variably show present-day conditions of either normal (approximately hydrostatic) pressure or significant overpressures (exceeding hydrostatic). The question is, in the case of the presently normally pressured shales, did these rocks never experience fluid overpressure, or did overpressure develop but then dissipate? And, if the latter, then when and why was pressure lost? We report detailed evidence that both the presently overpressured and normally pressured shales consistently record an early (120–106 Ma) stage of high fluid overpressure, >70% of the lithostatic load, caused by gas generation during deep burial. The pressure regime then later diverged during subsequent uplift, as the currently normally pressured rocks underwent faster pressure release because of rapid uplift during the late Yanshanian Orogeny, whereas the presently overpressured rocks experienced more gradual uplift that favored preservation of high fluid pressures. Our results demonstrate that the fluid inclusions hosted in shale fracture veins directly record the fluid pressure changes in shale layers, providing more intuitive insight into the dynamic evolution of shale gas generation and accumulation.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].