About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print


Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 September 2022.

Copyright © 2022. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/08182221123

Difference in overpressure environments for the western and central deepwater Gulf of Mexico

Sharon Cornelius1 and Peter A. Emmet2

1 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 77204
2 Brazos Valley GeoServices, Inc., 19831 Cypress Church Rd., Cypress, TX 77433

Ahead of Print Abstract

Previous results from the central Gulf of Mexico (CGOM) protraction areas of Garden Banks, Green Canyon, Keathley Canyon, and Walker Ridge included calculation of both geopressure and geothermal gradients from 150 wells, and produced a new understanding of the geopressure distribution within the deepwater CGOM. Disequilibrium compaction is a major component of the overall GOM overpressure (Yu and Hilterman, 2014; Lahann, 2017); but is more easily discernible in the interval from the seafloor down to where formation temperatures are ˃65°C, at which point temperature-based chemical reactions commenced sequentially with rising temperature. These reactions, which usually produce greater quantitative overpressure than disequilibrium compaction, include hydrocarbon generation, smectite to illite transformation, and sandstone diagenesis. This study has incorporated the western Gulf of Mexico (WGOM) protraction areas of East Breaks, Alaminos Canyon, Corpus Christi, and Port Isabel, where 249 wells were analyzed to verify the CGOM results. The result is that the WGOM is geothermally warmer and considerably underpressured compared to the CGOM. Measured and calculated temperature-pressure pair data points at varying depths within the boreholes were plotted separately for both regions. The distribution of the data on each plot is regionally unique. In the CGOM, most overpressure was likely created in situ or proximal to its source. In the WGOM, the formations fractured at some point and geopressure escaped. Compressional velocities versus density crossplots were created for four wells, each well representative of a different protraction area, to indicate the source of local overpressure.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

Sharon Cornelius , Peter A. Emmet: Difference in overpressure environments for the western and central deepwater Gulf of Mexico, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 September 2022: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/08182221123.

Close