About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print


Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 1 October 2022.

Copyright © 2022. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/09232220163

Fluvial Reservoir Architecture, Directional Heterogeneity, Recognizing Incised Valley Fills, and the Case for Nodal Avulsion on a Distributive Fluvial System: Kern River Field, California

D. K. Larue, J. Allen, D. Beeson, and J. Robbins

Ahead of Print Abstract

Kern River Field of California contains a succession over 1000 ft thick of Late Miocene fluvial deposits representing a Distributive Fluvial System (DFS). Well spacing is so tight (100-200 ft) that well logs can be used to create images that appear similar to seismic sections that can be readily interpreted. Directional heterogeneity and continuity are associated with orientation of the channelized geobodies: parallel to paleocurrent direction, sandstone continuity is measurably higher. Larger channelized geobodies at Kern River Field are on average 46 ft (15 m) thick, and 1.4 miles (2.2 km) wide (perpendicular to paleocurrent flow). They possess a mappable lower erosional surface, and internally, consist of high net to gross, multi-story sandstone bodies. These large channelized geobodies are interpreted to represent the fills of incised valleys. Incised valley deposits are produced by punctuated incision and aggradation typically related to falls in base level, from whatever origin. The valleys are then filled during subsequent periods of aggradation, first resulting in the filling of the valleys, and then allowing the floodplain to aggrade as well. Two systems tracts can then be defined (after Shanley and McCabe, 1994): the incised-valley tract, representing the typically high net to gross fill of the incised valley, and the aggradation tract, representing the aggradation of the floodplain as well as associated single- and multi-story sandstone bodies that are not contained within incised valleys. The high frequency of these geobodies may be associated with changes in Late Miocene climate, base level, eustacy, and autocyclic nodal avulsions on a DFS.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

D. K. Larue, J. Allen, D. Beeson, J. Robbins: Fluvial Reservoir Architecture, Directional Heterogeneity, Recognizing Incised Valley Fills, and the Case for Nodal Avulsion on a Distributive Fluvial System: Kern River Field, California, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 01 October 2022: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/09232220163.

Close