About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print

Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 18 December 2023.

Copyright © 2023. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


A primer on West Siberian Basin stratigraphy: chronostratigraphic cross references for Cretaceous- and Jurassic-age strata: Russian Federation

Robert S. Tye

Ahead of Print Abstract

Stratigraphic nomenclature describing Cretaceous- and Jurassic-age strata spanning the continental to deep-water depositional realms in the West Siberian Basin is lithostratigraphic, complex, and locally variable. A bureaucratically derived stratigraphic nomenclature system developed during early exploration (1940’s), is administered by the Inter-Agency Stratigraphy Commission (IASC). Formation names were assigned on a well-by-well basis according to the well’s geographic location, the strata’s facies characteristics (i.e., facies regions, facies zones), stratigraphic position, and the hydrocarbon region in which the well was drilled. Although rocks were primarily dated biostratigraphically, little-to-no consideration was given to the strata’s correlation in time. Thus, basin-scale lithostratigraphic cross sections display a plethora of formation names and lack chronostratigraphic detail. Furthermore, reservoirs are indexed by the IASC. That is, reservoirs within a formation are given discrete names. Indexed reservoirs are correlated lithostratigraphically across timelines resulting in incorrect predictions of reservoir continuity and erroneous volumetric estimates. The plethora of formation names and reservoir indices are of little use in relating the geological characteristics of hydrocarbon fields basin wide. Geologic age is the only criterion linking the stratigraphy of one location to the next.

Stratigraphic columns are summarized to place formation names and reservoirs into a basin-wide chronostratigraphic context. Until the advent of basin-scale sequence-stratigraphic studies, these summaries offer the only basin-scale method of relating variously named formations and reservoirs chronostratigraphically. Moreover, at the field scale, chronostratigraphic correlation of parasequences, as opposed to lithostratigraphically correlating indexed reservoirs, can resolve field-development problems by yielding more precise estimates of resource volumes and distribution and more efficiently placed wells.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

Robert S. Tye: A primer on West Siberian Basin stratigraphy: chronostratigraphic cross references for Cretaceous- and Jurassic-age strata: Russian Federation, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 18 December 2023: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/12212323015.