About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print


Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 August 2024.

Copyright © 2024. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/08082424025

Challenges with managing unconventional water production and disposal in the Permian Basin

Katie M. Smye, Katherine Yut, Robert C. Reedy, Bridget R. Scanlon, Jean-Philippe Nicot, and Peter Hennings

Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin.

Ahead of Print Abstract

Produced water associated with oil and gas production from unconventional reservoirs in the Permian Basin has the potential to constrain future production if not managed effectively. The objective of this work was to report trends in produced and disposed water volumes, and to highlight disposal capacity challenges and implications for future development. We compiled production and disposal data from public and commercial databases, focusing on the Midland and Delaware Basins. Results show that annual produced water volumes from unconventional wells in the Permian Basin increased by a factor of 30 from 2010 –2022. Unconventional produced water volumes in 2022 totaled approximately 5 billion barrels, with 70% from the Delaware Basin and 30% from the Midland Basin. This increase reflects increasing numbers of horizontal wells drilled (~6000 in 2022), lateral lengths (~2 miles in 2022) and water to oil ratios (averaging 3.3 in 2022 and up to 10 locally). Currently, almost all PW from unconventional production is managed by disposal into strata shallower (75%) or deeper (25%) than producing intervals. Adverse impacts of disposal include induced seismicity linked mainly to deep disposal, drilling hazards related to overpressuring in shallow disposal zones, compromised integrity of older vertical wellbores, and surface discharges of produced water. Increasing produced water recycling for Previous HithydraulicNext Hit Previous HitfracturingNext Hit would improve management in the Midland Basin where produced water and Previous HithydraulicNext Hit Previous HitfracturingNext Hit volumes are currently similar, but large excesses of produced water (3.6 × Previous HithydraulicTop fracture demand) in the Delaware Basin will remain a challenge, necessitating development of alternative water management strategies.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

Katie M. Smye, Katherine Yut, Robert C. Reedy, Bridget R. Scanlon, Jean-Philippe Nicot, Peter Hennings: Challenges with managing unconventional water production and disposal in the Permian Basin, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 August 2024: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/08082424025.

Close