About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print


Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 January 2026.

Copyright © 2026. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/01092623123

Differentiation and effect on ultra-deep clastic reservoirs of early carbonate cements: Insights from the Cretaceous in Kuqa depression, northwestern China

Jian Wang, Bing Wu, Zhenkun Li, Yingchang Cao, Haijun Yang, Shunyu Wang, Hongxiang Wei, Keyu Liu, and Tao Mo

Ahead of Print Abstract

Early carbonate cement is common and widely distributed in clastic rocks, and has a complex impact on the quality of clastic reservoirs. At present, although there are studies indicating that early formation of carbonate cement can protect reservoirs to a certain extent, there is no empirical evidence to prove it. Early carbonate is the most abundant cement in the Cretaceous continental ultra-deep clastic sandstone in the Kuqa depression. The petrographic characteristics, Previous HitspatialNext Hit distribution and geochemical characteristics of early carbonate cements in the Cretaceous sandstone reservoir are systematically investigated to discuss the origin, distinct distribution and its multifaceted impact on ultra-deep clastic reservoirs. During the early Paleogene, meteoric water leached the Paleogene carbonate rocks, providing material for early carbonate cements. Affected by lateral recharge of meteoric water and the vertical recharge of seawater, and the normal-graded sequence, early calcite and dolomite cements with significantly Previous HitspatialTop different distribution characteristics were precipitated in the ultra-deep clastic reservoirs. Due to the differences in the content and compaction resistance of early calcite and dolomite, their impact on reservoir quality is opposite. Early calcite occupies the reservoir space to varying degrees and has weak compaction resistance, seriously damaging the reservoir quality. Early dolomite has a relatively low content and strong compaction resistance, which can effectively protect the reservoir during deep burial and strong lateral compression processes. This study provides a good example of the positive effect of early carbonate cements on the formation and development of high-quality reservoirs.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

Jian Wang, Bing Wu, Zhenkun Li, Yingchang Cao, Haijun Yang, Shunyu Wang, Hongxiang Wei, Keyu Liu, Tao Mo: Differentiation and effect on ultra-deep clastic reservoirs of early carbonate cements: Insights from the Cretaceous in Kuqa depression, northwestern China, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 January 2026: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/01092623123.

Close