About This Item

This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a future issue of the AAPG Bulletin. This abstract and associated PDF document are based on the authors' accepted "as is" manuscript.

Editorial Policy for Ahead of Print


Cite This Item

Display Citation

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Visit Publisher's Website  

Ahead of Print Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, Preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 January 2026.

Copyright © 2026. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/01092624083

Quantifying sources of gas hydrate through diagenetic modeling

Zichen Wang12 , Xinyu Ming12 , Zhaohui Xu3 , and Lei Jiang12

1 State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
2 College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3 PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Ahead of Print Abstract

Determining the sources of methane for hydrate formation is critical for hydrate exploration and for understanding its implications on the global carbon cycle, climate change, ocean chemistry, and the biosphere throughout Earth's history. However, quantifying the gas sources for ancient hydrate records presents a considerable challenge due to the absence of direct evidence. Authigenic carbonates (AC), formed through the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), have partially retained the δ13C Previous HitsignatureTop of ancient hydrates, providing a unique opportunity to identify their gas sources. In this study, we simulate the variations in δ13C values of AC precipitation associated with AOM under different AOM rates and specific methane source scenarios. Our findings suggest that the observed changes in δ13CAC with heavy δ18OAC (mostly ~2.0‰ to 7.7‰), across global compilations associated with AOM, are best explained by varying ratios of biogenic versus thermogenic methane and differences in AOM rates. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that thermogenic methane contributions at half of the investigated gas hydrate seeps range from 17.3% to 81.5% (average 47.1%; n=3) by volume. The compiled ages, coinciding with δ13C values of AC, suggest that amplified methane release, associated with an increased contribution from thermogenic methane and high AOM rates, preferentially occurred during interglacial periods over the past 150,000 years. The previously underestimated role of thermogenic methane, which likely played a positive feedback role in global warming, necessitates a reevaluation of the impact of methane seeps on global carbon cycles and climates dynamics throughout Earth's history.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].

Please cite this AAPG Bulletin Ahead of Print article as:

Zichen Wang , Xinyu Ming , Zhaohui Xu , Lei Jiang: Quantifying sources of gas hydrate through diagenetic modeling, (in press; preliminary version published online Ahead of Print 15 January 2026: AAPG Bulletin, DOI:10.1306/01092624083.

Close