About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

CSPG Bulletin

Abstract


Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology
Vol. 66 (2018), No. 2. (June), Pages 472-498

Laboratory-Based Characterization of Pore Network and Matrix Previous HitPermeabilityNext Hit in the Montney Formation: Insights Previous HitfromNext Hit Methodology Comparisons

Amin Ghanizadeh, Christopher R. Clarkson, Atena Vahedian, Omid H. Ardakani, James M. Wood, Hamed Sanei

Abstract

This work presents results Previous HitfromNext Hit an ongoing laboratory study investigating pore network characteristics and matrix Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit of selected intervals within the Montney Formation (Western Canada). The primary objectives are to: 1) compare different laboratory-based methodologies for determination of porosity and matrix Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit; 2) characterize the pore network attributes (porosity, pore size distribution (PSD), dominant pore throat size, specific surface area) and matrix Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit of the selected target intervals; and 3) analyse the effects of different controlling factors (anisotropy, effective stress, bitumen saturation) on matrix Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit. Eight selected pairs of core plugs, drilled vertically and horizontally, are analysed in this study. These core plugs are obtained Previous HitfromNext Hit a vertical interval of 15 m within the fine-grained intervals of the Upper Montney Formation in British Columbia (Canada). The experimental techniques used for characterization include: bitumen reflectance (BRo); Rock-Eval pyrolysis; helium pycnometry; Archimedes, caliper and 3D laser scanner analyses; low-pressure gas (N2) adsorption; pulse-decay; and crushed-rock gas (N2, He) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit measurements.

Excluding one of the samples (a laminated vertical core plug): 1) the slip-corrected pulse-decay gas (N2) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values (measured at effective stress of 15.8 MPa) and apparent crushed-rock gas (He) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values generally increase with increasing porosity (4.2–8.1%), ranging Previous HitfromNext Hit 1.4 · 10−5 to 8.6·10−4 mD: and 2) the slip-corrected pulse-decay (N2) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values (1.2·10−4–8.6·10−4 mD) are consistently higher than apparent crushed-rock (He) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values (1.4·10−5–1·10−4 mD). Pulse-decay (N2) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values measured parallel to bedding (horizontal core plugs) are consistently between 10% and 25 times higher than those measured perpendicular to bedding (vertical core plugs). Based on a single pair of laminated core plugs analysed in this study, the degree of Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit anisotropy (ratio between parallel and perpendicular Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values) appears to be significantly higher for the laminated core plugs (up to 25 times) than bioturbated core plugs (up to 3.5 times). Compared to pulse-decay (N2) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values, there is a minimal discrepancy (considering the maximum experimental error margin) between the crushed-rock gas Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values that were measured on pairs of horizontal/vertical core plugs after crushing/sieving. In a gross sense, slip-corrected pulse-decay (N2) Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values decrease with increasing bitumen saturation.

Applying multiple analysis techniques on a selected suite of core plugs and crushed-rock materials derived Previous HitfromNext Hit them, this study provides: 1) valuable insight into the causes of observed variations in porosity/Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values obtained Previous HitfromNext Hit laboratory-based techniques; and 2) an integrated description of pore network characteristics and matrix Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit for selected fine-grained intervals within the Montney Formation.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24