About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Environmental Geosciences (DEG)

Abstract

Environmental Geosciences, V. 16, No. 1 (March 2009), P. 25-39.

Copyright copy2009. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists/Division of Environmental Geosciences. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/eg.09090808004

Site characterization considerations for LNAPL spills on the buried valley train surfaces of the lower Mississippi River Valley

Thomas M. Whitworth,1 Akbar Ghazifard2

1Department of Geological Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Missouri; [email protected]
2Department of Geology, Isfahan University, Iran

AUTHORS

T. M. Whitworth's research interests are the role of heterogeneity in groundwater and contaminant transport processes specifically focusing on geologic membrane processes and nonaqueous-Previous HitphaseNext Hit liquid (NAPL) behavior. He also does research in global sustainability. He teaches at the Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly known as the University of Missouri-Rolla).

Akbar Ghazifard teaches in the geology department of the University of Esfahan in Esfahan, Iran, and is a former head of that department. His research interests include evaluation of mining activities on groundwater pollution, heavy metal contamination, and the causes of road subsidence on playas, as well as nonaqueous-Previous HitphaseNext Hit liquid (NAPL) contamination.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Serious thanks to Sarah Bruning who spent many long hours drafting many of the figures for this article. Thanks to William G. Murray, Rima V. Petrossian, and Janet S. Roemmel for their effort and excellent reviews that greatly improved this article.

ABSTRACT

A large number of potential light nonaqueous-Previous HitphaseNext Hit liquid (LNAPL) traps exist in poorly sorted sands underlying the buried valley train surfaces in the lower Mississippi River Valley (LMRV). These traps should be considered during site characterization and remediation activities related to spilled nonaqueous-Previous HitphaseTop liquids and leaking underground storage tanks on the valley train surfaces of the LMRV. These traps have apparent average dimensions of 0.84 by 0.21 km (0.52 by 0.13 mi), with an average closure height of 2.7 m (8.85 ft). The maximum apparent lateral dimensions are 4.19 by 0.69 km (2.6 by 0.42 mi) and the minimum observed lateral dimensions are 0.06 by 0.02 km (0.03 by 0.01 mi). Apparent closure heights range from less than 1 m (3 ft) to an apparent maximum of 7.6 m (24.93 ft). A depth of about 4.3 m (14.1 ft) is assumed to be a maximum likely excavation depth for underground storage tank installations in the LMRV. The top stratum thickness in 47 of the 100 borings used to construct cross sections in this study was less than 4.3 m (14.1 ft). Thus, it is likely that underground storage tank installations, for example, have or will breach the top stratum at many sites on the valley train surfaces. In order for spilled LNAPLs from underground storage tank sites to migrate into one of these traps, it is probably necessary that the original excavation breach the low-permeability top stratum and that the water table seasonally fluctuates from below the base of the top stratum to above the base of the top stratum.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24