About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Environmental Geosciences (DEG)
Abstract
DOI: 10.1306/eg.02071716007
Geologic-carbon-sequestration potential of the Ordovician St. Peter Sandstone, Michigan and Illinois Basins, United States
David A. Barnes,1 Kevin M. Ellett,2 and John A. Rupp3
1Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, 1903 West Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008; [email protected]
2Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University, 611 North Walnut Grove Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; [email protected]
3Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University, 611 North Walnut Grove Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Cambrian–Ordovician strata of the midwestern United States are considered a promising reservoir for geologic storage of carbon dioxide. To assess the potential of the Ordovician St. Peter Sandstone, storage-resource estimates were generated using a hierarchical approach to estimating prospective storage resources. The method employs a series of increasingly sophisticated analyses to better facilitate an understanding of the uncertainty in the estimates. Results demonstrate how uncertainty of storage-resource estimates varies as a function of data availability and quality as well
as the underlying assumptions used in the application of specific storage efficiency factors.
In the simplest analysis
, storage-resource estimates were calculated from updated regional-scale mapping of the gross thickness of the formation and by applying a single best estimate of the mean porosity for the entire formation. This
analysis
follows the technique prescribed by the US Department of Energy and yields storage-resource estimates ranging from 3.3 to 35.1 billion t CO2 in the Michigan Basin and 1.0 to 11.0 billion t CO2 in the Illinois Basin at the 10% and 90% probability levels. The second
analysis
incorporated generalized models of the diagenetic history of the formation throughout the two basins by implementing depth-dependent functions of porosity that lead to more realistic portrayals of spatially variable results. Similar resource estimates were calculated for the Michigan Basin, but reduced estimates (43%) were found for the Illinois Basin. The third
analysis
explicitly accounted for the local-scale spatial variability in reservoir quality using net-porosity calculations, resulting in a significant increase in the low-range resource estimate for the Michigan Basin and dramatic increases for Illinois Basin resource estimates (factor of 3 to 11 increases). A fourth
analysis
was conducted for the Michigan Basin that used advanced reservoir characterization to define reservoir properties for multiple reservoir facies and yielded resource estimates significantly larger than the third
analysis
and a larger range of uncertainty. This study highlights how different factors impact the expected uncertainty in storage-resource estimates, and
analysis
suggests that estimates from the first two approaches provide excessively conservative results, whereas the second two approaches tend to overestimate the resource.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |