About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
Fort Worth Geological Society
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Reservoir
Geology of the Willard Unit in the San Andres Wasson Field, West Texas
By
Robert G. Loucks1, Paul Mescher2, David Entzminger3, and Dennis Braaten
1 Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin,
TX
2 Veritas, Houston, TX
3 BP, Houston, TX
The Willard unit has produced 199 MMBO out of 450 MMBO
originally in place. Enhanced oil recovery methods are necessary to acquire
sustainable amounts of the remaining 54%. The Willard Unit is located on the
northeast limb of a broad domal paleostructure that localized the Wasson field
and created arid ramp-setting conditions favorable to carbonate production.
Three facies complexes are defined: (1) hypersaline peritidal/sabkha, (2) inner
ramp, and (3) outer ramp. Vertical heterogeneity of facies reflects
parasequences deposited in a transgressive/regressive cycle related to
long-term,
relative
sea-level rise and fall. Lateral heterogeneity is caused by
variations in water depth produced by paleotopography and by
relative
facies
position on the ramp. The highest reservoir quality and most continuous
reservoirs are in the dolomitized, inner-ramp restricted lagoon (mean porosity
is 8.4%, geometric mean
permeability
is 1.0 md) and moderate-energy shoal (mean
porosity is 8.5%, geometric mean
permeability
is 1.78 md) facies.
The dolostone pore network consists of vuggy, moldic, and
interparticle pores reduced by several forms of anhydrite. Because of strong
lateral and vertical variations in facies and diagenesis, there are significant
variations in reservoir quality. Several field-scale
permeability
barriers are
in the section. There appears to be no direct method to develop high-quality,
porosity/
permeability
transforms because of the complex history of diagenesis,
effects of anhydrite cement on measurements in small core plugs, and the
probable poor cleaning of relatively low reservoir-quality rocks. This is a
limiting factor in log analysis and modeling of the field for defining an
enhanced recovery program.