About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

GCAGS Transactions

Abstract


Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions
Vol. 27 (1977), Pages 440-440

Abstract: Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Chert from the Edwards Group, Lower Cretaceous, Central Texas

Lynton S. Land (1)

ABSTRACT

Oxygen isotopic composition of nodules and beds of replacement chert of the Edwards Group, from outcrop and subsurface of Central Texas, ranges between +30.2 and +33.9^pmil relative to Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW). D/H ratios vary between -26 and -86^pmil relative to SMOW. Although only 8 samples from the subsurface (maximum depth 3,400 m) and 25 from outcrop have been completely analyzed to date, burial to approximately 3.5 km (approximately 130°C) does not appear to have affected the ^dgr018, but may have affected slightly the ^dgrD of these microquartz cherts. Other forms of silica from both outcrop and subsurface, including megaquartz filling molds resulting from the dissolution of evaporite nodules, replacement megaquartz, and replacement chalcedony, are depleted in 018 relative to the chert nodules, with values as light as +25.5^pmil.

Microquartz chert probably formed from opal C-T precursors and replaced carbonate sediments which formed and were altered in a variety of environments ranging from hypersaline through meteoric. The variation in the oxygen isotopic composition of waters responsible for diagenesis of these rocks must have exceeded by at least a factor of 2 the observed 4^pmil range in ^dgr018 of these cherts. Possible contamination of chert by later generations of silica (depleted in 018) cannot be excluded as contributing to the observed range and, if present, would further limit the possible range in isotopic composition of water forming the chert. In addition, the ^dgr018 of Edwards chert is virtually identical to that of Cretaceous chert from European chalk which formed on open marine shelves. On this basis, silicification under a wide variety of salinity-temperature conditions is ruled out. Contemporaneous silicification under evaporitic conditions is ruled out by calibration with all available silica-water temperature scales. Silicification must have occurred either contemporaenously from solutions having a ^dgr018 close to SMOW or in the shallow subsurface at elevated temperature and from 018 enriched water.

End_of_Record - Last_Page 440-------

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND ASSOCIATED FOOTNOTES

(1) Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin

Copyright © 1999 by The Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies