About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

GCAGS Transactions

Abstract


Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions Vol. 58 (2008), Pages 703-709

Responses of Aquifers to Ground Previous HitWaterNext Hit Pumping Increases and Decreases in the Houston, Texas, Metropolitan Area

John W. Nelson

LBG-Guyton Associates, 11111 Katy Fwy., Ste. 850, Houston, Texas 77079

ABSTRACT

The Houston metropolitan region has plentiful Previous HitwaterNext Hit supplies available from several ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit aquifers and surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit reservoirs. Public supply, domestic, industrial and irrigation Previous HitwaterNext Hit wells are completed in fresh Previous HitwaterNext Hit sands in the Chicot and/or Evangeline aquifer or the deeper Jasper aquifer. Lake Livingston, Lake Houston, and Lake Conroe have been constructed to the north and northeast of Houston and provide surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit supplies from rivers to the region. The regional ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit pumping in the Houston District peaked at approximately 500 to 530 million gallons per day in the mid- to late 1970s. Since that time, the regional Previous HitwaterNext Hit demand has continued to increase. However, the ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit pumping has been declining and surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit supplies have been increasing in volume, areal distribution and overall importance. In 2006 and 2007, the ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit supply from Previous HitwaterNext Hit wells and the surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit supplies from reservoirs and rivers provided approximately ¼ and ¾, respectively, of the total Previous HitwaterNext Hit supply for Harris and Galveston counties. Ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit still provides the vast majority of the Previous HitwaterNext Hit supply for the adjoining counties in the region.

The hydrologic response of the aquifers to moderate to large ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit withdrawals is a reduction in the hydrostatic head in the aquifers and a decline in the static Previous HitwaterNext Hit level in wells. Large static Previous HitwaterNext Hit-level declines of approximately 130 to 300 feet were observed in some wells completed in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers in east and southeast Harris County.

The Harris-Galveston Subsidence District was formed in 1975, and regulations by the Subsidence District have reduced ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit pumping and regional land subsidence in the east, southeast, and central parts of the Houston metropolitan region. The hydrostatic heads in the aquifers have recovered in these same areas and the static Previous HitwaterNext Hit levels in some wells have risen about 175 to 245 feet.

Ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit use has increased in the west and north sections of the Houston region, where growth has continued and surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit has not been available, at least until recently in some limited areas. The static Previous HitwaterNext Hit levels in wells in these areas have declined in response. Regulations will require reductions in ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit pumping in the north and west parts of the region within the next two to ten years and aquifer Previous HitwaterNext Hit levels should rise and well pumping rates increase in response in these areas.

Currently, the design and construction of new surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit pipelines and infrastructure to deliver surface Previous HitwaterNext Hit to areas presently served only by Previous HitwaterNext Hit wells are in progress. Planners, regulators, major Previous HitwaterNext Hit users and scientists should work to ensure that an adequate number of large-capacity wells are available in the proper locations in the future so that the ground Previous HitwaterNext Hit aquifers are able to help meet normal Previous HitwaterNext Hit supply needs and emergency requirements, if one of the limited number of surface Previous HitwaterTop supplies is temporarily interrupted.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24