About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Indonesian Petroleum Association

Abstract


13th Annual Convention Proceedings (Volume 2), 1984
Pages 85-112

Some "Quick-Look" and Wellsite Applications of Wireline Formation Testing Tools with Emphasis on Previous HitPermeabilityNext Hit Indicators as an Aid to Choosing Net Pay Discriminators

P. Cooke-Yarborough

Abstract

A study is made of the effectiveness of some of the wellsite and "quick-look" applicatons of wireline formation testing tools, with emphasis on "quick-look" Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit indicators in clastic formations.

Approximate values of the "in situ" formation Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit can be calculated Previous HitfromNext Hit wireline formation tester information. The methods proposed are to (a) analyse the pressure build-up curve (as the primary method) and (b) average the two Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit values obtained Previous HitfromNext Hit the pressure draw-down analyses of the two pre-tests (as the secondary method). The objective is to sample a representative cross-section of the sands in the reservoir unit, and to project the Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit data derived to cover the entire reservoir.

It may be more critical to obtain an estimate of Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit deeper into the reservoir, away Previous HitfromNext Hit the formation which has possibly been altered by the drilling process. For this purpose, it can be better to use the pressure build-up data Previous HitfromNext Hit the wireline formation tester. Whereas this technique makes more attempt to indicate the virgin formation Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit, it is, perhaps, the harder of the two techniques to rigorously apply. It is often difficult to locate the relevant section of the build-up curve to analyse.

A case study shows examples of the effectiveness, as well as the limitations and inaccuracies, of techniques for wellsite or "quicklook" estimates of these analyses of wireline formation tester information to determine "in situ" formation Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit.

In spite of the obvious limitations on Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit determinations described, this application is seen as a useful supplement to some of the powerful roles of the tool, such as: establishing formation pressures, pressure gradients and fluid contact determination; formation sampling; reservoir depletion monitoring.

A useful application of the technique is envisaged as a wellsite or "quick-look" "net pay" indicator. It is often essential to try to estimate semi-quantitatively the effective Previous HitpermeabilityNext Hit throughout the reservoir towards the end of the drilling process.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24